2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limpet (Cellana spp.) shape is correlated with basalt or eolianite coastlines: Insights into prehistoric marine shellfish foraging and mobility in the Hawaiian Islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A temporal change in shell size can be used as a proxy for age to identify changing intensity of human foraging behaviour, or to signal environmental change in factors such as sea surface temperature (SST), turbidity, or wave action (Faulkner, 2009; Mannino and Thomas, 2002; Milner et al, 2007; Rogers and Weisler, 2020b). Shell size through time (examined across strata) was assessed for Neripteron neglectum ( pipipi ; speckled nerite), Nerita picea ( pipipi ; black nerite), Brachidontes crebristriatus ( kio nahawele ; Hawaiian mussel), Isognomon californicum ( nahawele ; black purse shell), and Isognomon spp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A temporal change in shell size can be used as a proxy for age to identify changing intensity of human foraging behaviour, or to signal environmental change in factors such as sea surface temperature (SST), turbidity, or wave action (Faulkner, 2009; Mannino and Thomas, 2002; Milner et al, 2007; Rogers and Weisler, 2020b). Shell size through time (examined across strata) was assessed for Neripteron neglectum ( pipipi ; speckled nerite), Nerita picea ( pipipi ; black nerite), Brachidontes crebristriatus ( kio nahawele ; Hawaiian mussel), Isognomon californicum ( nahawele ; black purse shell), and Isognomon spp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, despite their ubiquity, limpet species can sometimes be difficult to tell apart in the field (Simison and Lindberg, 2003;Burdi, 2015), at archaeological sites (Rogers and Weisler, 2020a) and in museum collections (Kuo and Sanford, 2013) owing to their highly variable shell morphologies and colour patterns (Nakano and Spencer, 2007). Even within species, shell features can vary according to substrate, size (age), population, and geographic region, sometimes resulting in distinct shell morphologies (Williams, 2017) and shapes (Rogers and Weisler, 2020b) To further complicate matters, shell erosion and encrusting symbionts can also impede visual identification. As a result, taxonomists frequently rely on using internal anatomical features, such as radular structure, as distinguishing characters (Simison and Lindberg, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%