2019
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01384-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Line Immunoassay for Confirmation and Discrimination of Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus Infections in Inconclusive Western Blot Serum Samples from Brazil

Abstract: Difficulties in confirming and discriminating human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and HTLV-2 infections by serological Western blot (WB) assays (HTLV Blot 2.4; MP Biomedicals) have been reported in Brazil, mainly in HIV/AIDS patients, with a large number of WB-indeterminate and WB-positive but HTLV-untypeable results. Nonetheless, a line immunoassay (LIA) (INNO-LIA HTLV-I/II; Fujirebio) provided enhanced specificity and sensitivity for confirming HTLV-1/2 infections. To add information concerning t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In further efforts to solve the long-standing problem with the WB approach described above, we evaluated the LIA method, an immunoblot approach based on recombinant antigens and synthetic peptides from HTLV-1/2 Gag and Env proteins, as an alternative confirmatory test [ 21 ]. LIA is commonly used in Europe and Brazil, and has been reported to be useful for confirmatory testing of HTLV-1 infection [ 22 25 ]. Quite recently this assay started to be available in Japan also [ 26 ], but as HTLV-1 in Japan belongs to a Japanese subgroup within Cosmopolitan subtype A [ 36 ], the assessment using Japanese samples as an alternative confirmatory test of LIA was insufficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In further efforts to solve the long-standing problem with the WB approach described above, we evaluated the LIA method, an immunoblot approach based on recombinant antigens and synthetic peptides from HTLV-1/2 Gag and Env proteins, as an alternative confirmatory test [ 21 ]. LIA is commonly used in Europe and Brazil, and has been reported to be useful for confirmatory testing of HTLV-1 infection [ 22 25 ]. Quite recently this assay started to be available in Japan also [ 26 ], but as HTLV-1 in Japan belongs to a Japanese subgroup within Cosmopolitan subtype A [ 36 ], the assessment using Japanese samples as an alternative confirmatory test of LIA was insufficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the line immunoassay (LIA) [ 21 ], which has been mainly used in Europe and Brazil as an alternative confirmatory test for HTLV-1 antibodies [ 22 25 ], has begun to be used in Japan [ 26 ]. Therefore, in this study, we sought to determine the current issues relating to a WB-based HTLV-1 diagnostic assay kit for Japanese samples, and to investigate the usefulness of the LIA as compared to WB for confirmation of sample reactivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some VMFs also expressed HTLV-1 antigens and caused the de novo infection of target cells in vivo. Accordingly, it is of interest to elucidate whether the bloodplacental barrier is disrupted by the HTLV-1 infection of VTs and line immunoassays (66), the use of higher-sensitivity testing is expected to lead to a more accurate understanding of the transplacental transmission of HTLV-1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while serological tests have high sensitivity, molecular assays stand out for their specificity and lower cost [ 25 ], which is an important feature for low and middle-income countries. However, LIA is time-consuming and has an elevated cost [ 27 ], and WB shows a prevalence of indeterminate results as high as 67% of cases [ 28 ], particularly in HTLV-2 carriers [ 26 , 29 , 30 , 31 ] and HIV/HTLV-coinfected individuals [ 27 , 32 ]. To overcome this issue, it was proposed to initially test blood samples with molecular assays, which display higher specificity, and negative samples might be further tested by WB or LIA, thus improving the cost-effectiveness of HTLV-1/2 infection diagnosis [ 25 , 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%