2015
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.167411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lineage-Specific Evolution of the Complex Nup160 Hybrid Incompatibility Between Drosophila melanogaster and Its Sister Species

Abstract: Two genes encoding protein components of the nuclear pore complex Nup160 and Nup96 cause lethality in F 2 -like hybrid genotypes between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster. In particular, D. simulans Nup160 and Nup96 each cause inviability when hemizygous or homozygous in species hybrids that are also hemizygous (or homozygous) for the D. melanogaster X chromosome. The hybrid lethality of Nup160, however, is genetically complex, depending on one or more unknown additional factors in the autosomal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remarkably, genetic analysis revealed that in the majority of tested cases the differences in essentiality were influenced by at least four different loci in the genome suggesting complex multigenic interactions (Dowell et al., ). Even the classical case of DMI in Drosophila is genetically complex, where hybrid lethality of Nup160 depends on one or more unknown additional factors in the autosomal background (Tang & Presgraves, ).…”
Section: Mechanistic Reasons For An Association Between Ecological Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, genetic analysis revealed that in the majority of tested cases the differences in essentiality were influenced by at least four different loci in the genome suggesting complex multigenic interactions (Dowell et al., ). Even the classical case of DMI in Drosophila is genetically complex, where hybrid lethality of Nup160 depends on one or more unknown additional factors in the autosomal background (Tang & Presgraves, ).…”
Section: Mechanistic Reasons For An Association Between Ecological Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nup96 and Nup160 are also involved in reproductive isolation ( Presgraves et al 2003 ; Tang and Presgraves 2009 ; Sawamura et al 2010 ). Nup96 sim and Nup160 sim synergistically cause hybrid incompatibility ( Sawamura et al 2014 ), but the D. melanogaster alleles of Nup160 and Nup96 are not the dominant autosomal incompatibility partner of Nup96 sim and Nup160 sim , respectively ( Tang and Presgraves 2015 ). Then, what is (are) the incompatibility partner(s) of Nup96 sim and Nup160 sim ?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When subsequently examined in crosses between D. melanogaster and D. mauritiana or D. sechellia, the D. melanogaster Nup96 incompatibility only occured in crosses with D. sechellia and not D. mauritiana (Barbash 2007). Similarly, sequence differences in Nup160 between D. simulans and D. mauritiana, as well as differences in the autosomal background of these species, modulate the strength of hybrid inviability in crosses with D. melanogaster (Tang and Presgraves 2015).…”
Section: Postzygotic Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%