1955
DOI: 10.1007/bf01180634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear kompakte Moduln und Ringe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

1967
1967
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the last condition, R is a matrix ring over a profinite local ring. We define (see [9]) a left linearly compact ring to be a topological ring having a fundamental system of neighborhoods of zero consisting of left ideals in which the intersection of every filter basis consisting of closed cosets with respect to left ideals is non-empty. For two idempotents of a ring R, we write e e ′ if ee ′ = e ′ e = e. A non-zero idempotent e is said to be minimal in R if there is no non-zero idempotent e 1 = e such that e 1 e. From [10] we recall that a ring R with 1 is said to be clean provided that every element in R is the sum of an idempotent and a unit.…”
Section: Notation and Conventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the last condition, R is a matrix ring over a profinite local ring. We define (see [9]) a left linearly compact ring to be a topological ring having a fundamental system of neighborhoods of zero consisting of left ideals in which the intersection of every filter basis consisting of closed cosets with respect to left ideals is non-empty. For two idempotents of a ring R, we write e e ′ if ee ′ = e ′ e = e. A non-zero idempotent e is said to be minimal in R if there is no non-zero idempotent e 1 = e such that e 1 e. From [10] we recall that a ring R with 1 is said to be clean provided that every element in R is the sum of an idempotent and a unit.…”
Section: Notation and Conventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now (e) follows from [23, Proposition 5.2.9] (and its proof), by applying the foregoing definitions (see also [11,Section 10], [20], [21], [29] and [41]). The details are left to the reader.…”
Section: Preliminaries On Quivers and Path Coalgebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11, Section 10], a description of the pseudocompact K-algebra KQ in terms of Cauchy nets is given, where the path algebra KQ is equipped with a K-precompact topology, which is obviously equivalent to our finite subquiver topology (see also [20] and [21]). …”
Section: Preliminaries On Quivers and Path Coalgebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Halmos' notation alglat M becomes alg (lat λ(R)) and R M K is a reflexive bimodule exactly when λ(R) is a reflexive algebra of operators on R M K . It is of interest to note that Leptin [5] considered the concept of alglat, although not in this notation, for topological modules in a study of completeness and linear compactness. A central lemma in the paper by Hadwin [4] states that if K is an infinite field and R = K[x], the polynomial ring, then the algebra R R K is reflexive as an R, K-bimodule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%