2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear multistep methods for optimal control problems and applications to hyperbolic relaxation systems

Abstract: We are interested in high-order linear multistep schemes for time discretization of adjoint equations arising within optimal control problems. First we consider optimal control problems for ordinary differential equations and show loss of accuracy for Adams-Moulton and Adams-Bashford methods, whereas BDF methods preserve high-order accuracy. Subsequently we extend these results to semi-lagrangian discretizations of hyperbolic relaxation systems. Computational results illustrate theoretical findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, multistep methods including Peer two-step methods avoid order reductions and allow a simple implementation [5,6]. However, the discrete adjoint schemes of linear multistep methods are in general not consistent or show a significant decrease of their approximation order [1,20]. Recently, we have developed implicit Peer two-step methods [12] with three stages to solve ODE constrained optimal control problems of the form minimize C y(T ) (1) subject to y (t) = f y(t), u(t) , u(t) ∈ U ad , t ∈ (0, T ],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, multistep methods including Peer two-step methods avoid order reductions and allow a simple implementation [5,6]. However, the discrete adjoint schemes of linear multistep methods are in general not consistent or show a significant decrease of their approximation order [1,20]. Recently, we have developed implicit Peer two-step methods [12] with three stages to solve ODE constrained optimal control problems of the form minimize C y(T ) (1) subject to y (t) = f y(t), u(t) , u(t) ∈ U ad , t ∈ (0, T ],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is related to the order of symplectic partitioned Runge-Kutta methods, and it implies in particular that applying naively a Runge-Kutta method to (1) yields in general an order reduction phenomenon. This analysis was then extended to other classes of Runge-Kutta type schemes in [17,18,14], see also [15,8] in the context of hyperbolic problems and multistep methods. The use of symplectic integrators is motivated by the recent publication [20] which proves the convergence of forward-backward iterative algorithm (Algorithm 2.3 in the present paper), to implement discretized optimal control problems, when using a symplectic Runge-Kutta method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large literature in this direction has been devoted to the construction of IMEX Runge-Kutta schemes satisfying the asymptotic-preserving (AP) property in the case of hyperbolic problems [10,12,24,27] and for kinetic equations [11,14,16,17]. For the case of IMEX linear multistep methods, we refer to [1,2,4,6,18,20,21,30,31] for results on the construction and properties…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%