Insertion duplication mutagenesis and allelic replacement mutagenesis are among the most commonly utilized approaches for targeted mutagenesis in bacteria. However, both techniques are limited by a variety of factors that can complicate mutant phenotypic studies. To circumvent these limitations, multiple markerless mutagenesis techniques have been developed that utilize either temperature-sensitive plasmids or counterselectable suicide vectors containing both positive-and negative-selection markers. For many species, these techniques are not especially useful due to difficulties of cloning with Escherichia coli and/or a lack of functional negative-selection markers. In this study, we describe the development of a novel approach for the creation of markerless mutations. This system employs a cloning-independent methodology and should be easily adaptable to a wide array of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial species. The entire process of creating both the counterselection cassette and mutation constructs can be completed using overlapping PCR protocols, which allows extremely quick assembly and eliminates the requirement for either temperature-sensitive replicons or suicide vectors. As a proof of principle, we used Streptococcus mutans reference strain UA159 to create markerless in-frame deletions of 3 separate bacteriocin genes as well as triple mutants containing all 3 deletions. Using a panel of 5 separate wild-type S. mutans strains, we further demonstrated that the procedure is nearly 100% efficient at generating clones with the desired markerless mutation, which is a considerable improvement in yield compared to existing approaches.Streptococcus mutans is a Gram-positive bacterial species that resides within multispecies oral biofilms formed on human tooth surfaces. It is also considered to be one of the principal species associated with dental caries initiation (6,7,34,35,44, 47,52). S. mutans genetic research has benefited tremendously from the many genetic tools that have been adapted for use in studies of the organism (4,5,13,15,22,25,26,29,33,45,51). For genetic studies of S. mutans, defined mutations are usually engineered in either of two ways: insertion duplication mutagenesis via single-crossover homologous recombination or marked allelic replacement mutagenesis using double-crossover homologous recombination (25,27,41). Both approaches are highly reliable strategies for mutagenesis and are simple to engineer, but they also have the potential to create unwanted artifacts that could influence the outcome of a genetic study. For example, insertion duplication mutations often result in the production of truncated proteins. Rarely is it known with certainty whether the protein fragments actually influence mutant phenotypes. Furthermore, due to significant polar effects downstream of the mutation site, both insertion duplication mutagenesis and allelic replacement mutagenesis are of limited utility within operons. In some cases, these issues have been addressed by creating allelic replacement mut...