2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linearly implicit Rosenbrock-type Runge–Kutta schemes applied to the Discontinuous Galerkin solution of compressible and incompressible unsteady flows

Abstract: a b s t r a c tIn this work we investigate the use of linearly implicit Rosenbrock-type Runge-Kutta schemes to integrate in time high-order Discontinuous Galerkin space discretizations of the Navier-Stokes equations. The final goal of this activity is the application of such schemes to the high-order accurate, both in space and time, simulation of turbulent flows. Besides being able to overcome the severe time step restriction of explicit schemes, Rosenbrock schemes have the attractive feature of requiring jus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The free stream flow is of false(ρ,u,v,Mafalse)=false(1.0,2false/2,2false/2,0.05false) and the gas constant R =1.0 for this case. The perturbation is defined as {arrayarrayδu=α2π(yy0)eϕ(1r2)arrayδv=α2π(xx0)eϕ(1r2)arrayδT=α2(γ1)16ϕγπ2e2ϕ(1r2), where ϕ=12 and α =5 are parameters that define the vortex strength. r =( x − x 0 ) 2 +( y − y 0 ) 2 is the distance to the center of the vortex ( x 0 , y 0 ).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free stream flow is of false(ρ,u,v,Mafalse)=false(1.0,2false/2,2false/2,0.05false) and the gas constant R =1.0 for this case. The perturbation is defined as {arrayarrayδu=α2π(yy0)eϕ(1r2)arrayδv=α2π(xx0)eϕ(1r2)arrayδT=α2(γ1)16ϕγπ2e2ϕ(1r2), where ϕ=12 and α =5 are parameters that define the vortex strength. r =( x − x 0 ) 2 +( y − y 0 ) 2 is the distance to the center of the vortex ( x 0 , y 0 ).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this choice, the matrix boldPfalse(boldwfalse)RmRm does not depend on w and reduces to identity matrix P = I . Alternatives to the set of conservative variables for compressible flows were investigated by several authors; in these cases, the transformation matrix P ( w ) can differ from I , see Bassi et al and Bassi et al The Cartesian components f c ( w ) and g c ( w ) of the convective F c ( w ) flux function equal fcfalse(boldwfalse)=[]arrayρuarrayρh0uarrayρuu+parrayρvu,gcfalse(boldwfalse)=[]arrayρvarrayρh0varrayρuvarrayρvv+p, where ρ is the fluid density, p is the pressure, u and v are the velocity components, respectively, e 0 and h 0 are the total energy and enthalpy per unit mass, respectively. The total enthalpy per unit mass is defined as h 0 = e 0 + p / ρ .…”
Section: Basic Concepts For Dg On Agglomerated Meshesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time discretization of Eq. (23) is efficiently performed by means of a linearly implicit Rosenbrock-type Runge-Kutta schemes, following the implementation presented in [27], that can be written as:…”
Section: Time Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%