Proceedings of the Workshop on Figurative Language Processing 2018
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w18-0902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linguistic Features of Sarcasm and Metaphor Production Quality

Abstract: Using linguistic features to detect figurative language has provided a deeper insight into figurative language. The purpose of this study is to assess whether linguistic features can help explain differences in quality of figurative language. In this study a large corpus of metaphors and sarcastic responses are collected from human subjects and rated for figurative language quality based on theoretical components of metaphor, sarcasm, and creativity. Using natural language processing tools, specific linguistic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"), (3) Humour ("How funny are the sentences ?") (Skalicky and Crossley, 2018), and (4) Grammaticality ("How grammatical are the sentences ?"). We design a MTurk task where Turkers were asked to rate outputs from all the six systems.…”
Section: Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…"), (3) Humour ("How funny are the sentences ?") (Skalicky and Crossley, 2018), and (4) Grammaticality ("How grammatical are the sentences ?"). We design a MTurk task where Turkers were asked to rate outputs from all the six systems.…”
Section: Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, for the first and the second example in Table 4, all of FM, RV and NSI are better than human generated sarcasm. In general, the generations from the FM model are more humorous, which is also an useful criterion to evaluate sarcasm besides sarcasticness (Skalicky and Crossley, 2018).…”
Section: Qualitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the explosion of internet usage, sarcasm detection in online communications from social networking platforms, discussion forums, and e-commerce websites has become crucial for opinion mining, sentiment analysis, and identifying cyberbullies—online trolls. The topic of sarcasm received great interest from Neuropsychology [ 1 ] to Linguistics [ 2 ], but developing computational models for automatic detection of sarcasm is still at its nascent phase. Earlier works on sarcasm detection on texts use lexical (content) and pragmatic (context) cues [ 3 ] such as interjections, punctuation, and sentimental shifts, which are major indicators of sarcasm [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the explosion of internet usage, sarcasm detection in online communications from social networking platforms [1,2], discussion forums [3,4], and e-commerce websites has become crucial for opinion mining, sentiment analysis, and in identifying cyberbullies, online trolls. The topic of sarcasm received great interest from Neuropsychology [5] to Linguistics [6], but developing computational models for automatic detection of sarcasm is still at its nascent phase. Earlier works on sarcasm detection on texts use lexical (content) and pragmatic (context) cues [7] such as interjections, punctuation, and sentimental shifts, that are major indicators of sarcasm [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%