Linking Disaster Risk Reduction and Healthcare in Locations with Limited Accessibility: Challenges and Opportunities of Participatory Research

Abstract

Disaster risk reduction and healthcare support each other, including the mitigation of further harm after illness or injury. These connections are particularly relevant in locations which have permanent or temporary limited accessibility. In these circumstances, people are required to be self-sufficient in providing emergency and long-term healthcare with limited resources. Planning and preparing to mitigate further harm after illness or injury from disasters (disaster risk reduction) must include people living and working in locations with limited accessibility, meaning that participatory research can be used. The challenges and opportunities of enacting participatory research in such contexts have not been thoroughly examined. The research question of this paper is therefore, “What challenges and opportunities occur when participatory research links disaster risk reduction and healthcare to mitigate illness and injury in locations with limited accessibility?” To answer this research question, the method used is a qualitative evidence synthesis, combined with an overview paper approach. Two principal themes of challenges and opportunities are examined: defining the data and collecting the data. The themes are explored in theory and then through contextual examples. The conclusion is that an overarching challenge is divergent goals of research and actions that, when recognized, lead to opportunities for improved connections between disaster risk reduction and healthcare.

Malaysian Disaster Medicine Research: A Bibliographic Study of Publication Trends

“…20,21 Patient safety, subject accessibility, data protection, informed consent, and ethics approval create a moral dilemma in conducting prospective research in a disaster event. 22 This study shows that more than one-half of the studies authored by Malaysian scholars are short reports. It may be explained not only by the moral challenges to conducting such research, but as well as the lack of resources, trained faculty, and research support staff to conduct original empirical research.…”

Addressing disaster and health risks for sustainable outer space

“…Such uncertainties can undermine the abilities to respond to manifesting health and disaster risks, and preferably preventing, reducing, or mitigating them and their impacts. This situation is not dissimilar from remote field care for health, which, while relatively established for helping people over short amounts of time, is not well explored or developed for prolonged periods of time (Kelman & Harris, 2020). On earth, the gap in knowledge and action by formal entities can be met by informal disaster governance, that is, the efforts of people, who are not officially tasked with DRR/R activities, to reduce disaster risks and/or respond to disasters (Duda et al, 2020).…”

The impact of crisis and disasters risk management in COVID-19 times: Insights and lessons learned from Saudi Arabia

“…Harsh punishments were levied on those who violated quarantine orders, such as large fines of more than 10,000 riyals. Kelman and Harris [27] argued that the use lockdown in UK contributed to reducing the limited accessibility of healthcare system since COVID-19 cases peaked.…”