Linking Flood Risk Mitigation and Food Security: An Analysis of Land-Use Change in the Metropolitan Area of Rome

Abstract

Land consumption and climate change have intensified natural disasters in urban areas. In response to these emergencies under the European 2030 Agenda, Sustainable Development Goals have been established to improve ecosystem protection and increase resilience and adaptation to natural disasters globally (Goal 13 “Climate action” and Goal 15 “Life on land”). In order to implement governance tools appropriately, it is necessary to know the relationships among the drivers, the changes in the state of urban ecosystems and agro-ecosystems, and the impact on the supply of goods and services at spatial and temporal scales. In this paper, Land-Use and Land-Cover Changes (LULCCs) in the metropolitan area of Rome have been investigated, with the purpose of detecting the synergistic variations in the supply of the flood mitigation and agricultural production ecosystem services (ES). The methodology is based on a GIS (Geographic Information System) analysis that identifies the transformation processes and permanencies related to land-cover. The variation in flood mitigation services was quantified through the use of the Urban Flood Risk Mitigation Model (UFRM) from the InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs) suite, while the variation in agricultural production through productivity coefficients was associated with changes in land-uses. Finally, an analysis of LULC-induced synergies and trade-offs between the two services was performed. The results show a net negative change in ES supply, caused mainly by urbanization at the expense of agricultural land. This decrease in ES supply is not offset by other LULCC transitions. In addition, the analysis of synergies and trade-offs between flood mitigation ES and agricultural production ES (in arable land, orchards, vineyards, and olive groves) shows that the reduction of agricultural land negatively affects both ES. The innovative contribution of this paper lies in setting an integrated methodology that is able to investigate how LULCC influences both hydraulic safety and food security. Findings can be useful to support planning of enhancing the role of agriculture in metropolitan areas.

Influence of Natural Risks and Non-Agricultural Income on Agricultural Trusteeship Decisions in Northeast China

“…Further analysis revealed that natural risks have a significant negative impact on the partial link APTS of farmers, Specifically, compared with farmers who are self-cultivation, the probability of natural risk for farmers to choice of partial outsourcing services decreases by 53.57% [65][66][67]. At the same time, natural risks have little effect on farmers' choice of partial outsourcing services or whole-process hosting services, both of which have a hindrance effect.…”

Concentrations of Potentially Toxic Elements in Topsoils of Urban Agricultural Areas of Rome

“…The focus of the investigation is primarily on the Rome municipality, covering 150,061.3 ha, and specifically, the arable land within it that amounts to 49,263.97 ha (QGIS 3.34) [75]. The "Città Metropolitana di Roma (CMRC)" institution plays a crucial role in guiding the sustainable development of the metropolitan area, with a key focus on enhancing food security via strategic planning, protection of high-production areas, and promoting local supply chains [76,77]. The Rome municipality is observed as an extraordinarily rich metropolis with great historical and environmental significance having a long history of biodiversity conservation and sustainable development [78,79].…”

Relationship between Disaster Shock Experience and Farmers’ Entrepreneurial Inclination: Crisis or Opportunity?

“…Disasters pose a major threat to the development of human society, and the imprint of the disaster shock experience is reflected in the psychological and behavioral patterns of the people affected [34]. Frequent natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, and floods, as well as the emergence of viruses such as COVID-19, challenge farmers' ability to cope with major disaster shocks [17,19,35,36]. Research on disasters should focus on not only their natural attributes but also their social attributes.…”