2007
DOI: 10.1051/ocl.2007.0118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking low docosahexaenoic acid intake to Alzheimer’s disease: caution recommended

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten out of 13 epidemiological studies presented in this review have shown an inverse relationship between n-3 PUFA intake or status and AD pathology. However, postmortem findings have been inconsistent [75] and clinical studies have shown no beneficial effect of n-3 PUFA in patients with AD, except in subgroups of patients with mild AD or MCI. Because epidemiological studies have observed an association between n-3 PUFA and AD, whereas clinical studies have failed to demonstrate a benefit, this suggests that the effect of n-3 PUFA on AD might only be seen after longterm treatment, i.e., lifetime consumption.…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Ten out of 13 epidemiological studies presented in this review have shown an inverse relationship between n-3 PUFA intake or status and AD pathology. However, postmortem findings have been inconsistent [75] and clinical studies have shown no beneficial effect of n-3 PUFA in patients with AD, except in subgroups of patients with mild AD or MCI. Because epidemiological studies have observed an association between n-3 PUFA and AD, whereas clinical studies have failed to demonstrate a benefit, this suggests that the effect of n-3 PUFA on AD might only be seen after longterm treatment, i.e., lifetime consumption.…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 95%