2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2012.12.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking nm-scale measurements of the anisotropy of silicate surface reactivity to macroscopic dissolution rate laws: New insights based on diopside

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

14
94
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
14
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5]). Both microscopes afford direct observation of mineral surfaces, and in situ AFM [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and VSI [1,[13][14][15][16][17] have greatly expanded the understanding of reaction kinetics for a diverse range of carbonates, silicates, and other important phases. Calcite has been a favorite AFM and VSI target, due to its clear importance in environmental systems, its simple composition, and perfect cleavage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5]). Both microscopes afford direct observation of mineral surfaces, and in situ AFM [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and VSI [1,[13][14][15][16][17] have greatly expanded the understanding of reaction kinetics for a diverse range of carbonates, silicates, and other important phases. Calcite has been a favorite AFM and VSI target, due to its clear importance in environmental systems, its simple composition, and perfect cleavage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes studies on chemical and biochemical weathering (e.g. Hellmann et al 2012;Daval et al 2013;Bray 2014), archaeological findings damage (e.g. Rodriguez-Navarro and Benning 2013) or during mineral replacement (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimentally and analytically, fundamental information about the evolution of reacting surface topographies and their heterogeneity have been gained by using surface-sensitive techniques such as atomic force microscopy, interferometry microscopy, or spectroscopy techniques (e.g., [1][2][3]). Measured reaction rates in laboratory experiments differ significantly under otherwise identical chemical conditions, often up to two to three orders of magnitude (e.g., [4,5]), indicating intrinsic differences in crystal surface reactivity [6]. As yet, a consistent theoretical model based on a purely mechanistic understanding of the heterogeneous distribution of surface reactivity is unavailable, despite its critical importance in understanding processes of, e.g., mineral conversion [7] or the pore evolution in geological structures [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%