Linking recreational disturbance to population size in a ground‐nesting passerine

Abstract

Summary 1.There is often a perceived conflict between recreational access and wildlife conservation. Although many studies have investigated the potential effects on birds, this is the first study to demonstrate an impact of recreational disturbance on population size. 2. We studied the impact of disturbance on a woodlark Lullula arborea population on 16 heathland sites in southern England. These sites all had historical records of breeding woodlarks and together encompassed a range of visitor-access levels. 3. A logistic regression model of patch use was used to quantify the area of habitat suitable for woodlarks. Woodlarks favoured patches with substantial proportions of bare ground and short vegetation. Across heaths, woodlark density (per hectare of suitable habitat) was lower on sites with higher levels of disturbance. Within heaths with recreational access, the probability of suitable habitat being colonized was lower in those areas with greater disturbance and was reduced to below 50% at around eight disturbance events per hour. There was no relationship between disturbance and daily nest survival rates. Birds on heaths with higher levels of disturbance fledged more chicks (per pair) because of a strong density-dependent increase in reproductive output. 4. A model is presented that predicts the consequences for the woodlark population of a range of access scenarios. The impact on the population depends on both the numbers of people and their spatial distribution. Under current access arrangements, a doubling of visitor numbers has little effect, while the same number of people distributed evenly across all sites leads to a major negative impact on the population. Density-dependent breeding success partially balances the negative effects of disturbance; however, we calculated that there is currently a 17% reduction in productivity compared with that predicted in the absence of disturbance. 5. Synthesis and applications . Many previous studies have stressed the negative effects of recreational disturbance on birds' behaviour, distribution and breeding success. However, from a conservation viewpoint, the impact at the population level is of paramount importance. Modelling the population-scale consequences of alternative access scenarios will help policymakers develop appropriate mitigation measures.

Learning from the past to predict the future: using archaeological findings and GPS data to quantify reindeer sensitivity to anthropogenic disturbance in Norway

“…Notwithstanding the rapidly increasing amount of studies on the effects of anthropogenic disturbance, a comprehensive approach to quantify wild species' spatial responses to different types of infrastructures has not yet been developed. Research focus has shifted from early studies documenting short-term behavioural or physiological reactions towards more comprehensive long-term approaches investigating the species' changes in space 55 use at the landscape scale (Underhill and Angold 2000), ultimately aiming at linking individual responses to population processes (Mallord et al 2007;Gaillard et al 2010;Sorensen et al 2008). The most recent studies investigate disturbance effects by measuring to which extent anthropogenic factors influence habitat selection (Johnson et al 2005;Aarts et al 2008;Polfus et al 2011).…”

An ecological approach to birdstrike risk analysis

“…Some primary characteristics of airport habitats are meadows and welldrained paved surfaces that are occasionally close to ponds or small rivers and channels (Robinson 2005). Thus, for birds, airports provide suitable habitats for roosting, feeding and breeding, while disturbance may be a minor factor (Mallord et al 2007a). Disturbance effects from aircraft traffic and human activities may be negligible for some bird species; often they habituate to intensive acoustic disturbance (Conomy et al 1998;Soldatini et al 2008) and maintain their normal activity patterns (Baudains and Lloyd 2007;Rees et al 2005).…”

Reconsidering the Effectiveness of Scientific Tools for Negotiating Local Solutions to Conflicts between Recreation and Conservation with Stakeholders

“…Also, uncertainties, or disagreements, about resources, parameter setting, and management effects have to be made explicit ). At present, the only http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss4/art17/ examples available are of recreation tools and biodiversity tools that are partly integrated (e.g., Mallord et al 2007, Coombes et al 2008. As yet, no tool has been developed to dynamically and concurrently model the behavior of animals and of visitors (see also Skov-Petersen 2008).…”