2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking uplift and mineralisation at the Mount Novit Zn-Pb-Ag Deposit, Northern Australia: Evidence from geology, U–Pb geochronology and sphalerite geochemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, a sedimentary/diagenetic origin can definitely be excluded based on the mineral, thermobarometry, and geochronology datasets. Such epigenetic models at relatively similar thermobarometric conditions are coherent with some recent reappreciations of other worldwide Pb-Zn(-Ag-Cu-Fe) deposits from Australian and Chinese belts [14,18].…”
Section: An Alpine Pb-ag Mineralizationsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, a sedimentary/diagenetic origin can definitely be excluded based on the mineral, thermobarometry, and geochronology datasets. Such epigenetic models at relatively similar thermobarometric conditions are coherent with some recent reappreciations of other worldwide Pb-Zn(-Ag-Cu-Fe) deposits from Australian and Chinese belts [14,18].…”
Section: An Alpine Pb-ag Mineralizationsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…They are located in the same litho-structural context in Permo-Triassic phyllitic quartzite of the External Briançonnais domain of the Internal Alps. In the absence of ages or mineralizing conditions (P, T, speciation), metallogenic models are still debated because of the stratiform or vein-like type mineralizations that could either result from sedimentary or orogenic processes [3][4][5][6][7][8]13], as for other worldwide Pb-Zn(-Ag-Cu) deposits in several mountain belts (e.g., Pyrenees, Mount Isa region, and North China craton) mainly considered initially as sedimentary but revealed in fact to be orogen-driven [14][15][16][17][18]. This study proposes for the first time a multitechnique investigation on these two deposits, coupling field observations, microstructure and mineral paragenesis identification, and thermobarometry and geochronology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these ternary plots, the Nanmushu sphalerite also falls into the MVT field, which is clearly different from the SEDEX, VMS, and Skarn deposits. [5,13,14,[65][66][67][68][69][70][71]; MVT data are collected from references [3,5,18,30,[41][42][43]50,66,[72][73][74]; SEDEX data are collected from references [75][76][77][78][79]; Skarn data are collected from references [3,5,13,14,67,[80][81][82]; and VMS data are collected from references [3,5,66,83,84].…”
Section: Genesis Of Ore Depositmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This orogeny is envisaged to have occurred as a consequence of collision between Paleoproterozoic Australia (then consisting of the North Australia Craton and the South Australian Craton with the North China Craton and a large piece of East Antarctica) and Laurentia (Pourteau et al, 2018), and is recorded by the Racklan Orogeny in NW Laurentia (Furlanetto et al, 2013). Orogenic activity coeval with younger Picuris Orogeny are found in the Gawler Craton of Australia (Hall et al, 2018;Morrissey et al, 2019), and in the Mount Isa region of NE Australia (Cave et al, 2022).…”
Section: Paleo-to Mesoproterozoic Orogensmentioning
confidence: 99%