Lions in the modern arena of CITES

Abstract

Lions have often been discussed under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of wild flora and fauna (CITES). While CITES decisions on species trade regimes are ostensibly based on science, species data are often inconclusive and political considerations inevitably determine outcomes. We present the context of lion conservation and the technical and political processes of CITES to illuminate how a failed uplisting proposal nonetheless resulted in an unprecedented trade restriction as well as conservation initiatives beyond the CITES trade function.We conclude on the limitations of science to guide future directions of CITES debates, leaving politics and ethics to shape decision making. K E Y W O R D SAfrica, conference of parties, convention, international, lion bone, trade Conservation Letters. 2018;11:e12444.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/conl

Race and Gender Bias in the Research Community on African Lions

“…There are political tensions in international meetings when expert groups advising African decision-makers are populated mainly by White men. The implications have been widely discussed (Karlsson et al, 2007;Mammides et al, 2016), we add that this is particularly relevant for lionsa species that is increasingly conservation dependent, leading to increased political interest (Bauer et al, 2018;Hodgetts et al, 2018). The present study is only an assessment of a few dimensions of identity, further study can look at the potential synergy between these dimensions and look at other dimensions like religion, sexual orientation, and socio-economic background.…”

Shooting pheasants for sport: What does the death of Cecil tell us?

“…In the face of increasing hostility among both non‐specialists and conservation scientists alike (Batavia et al, ), it may therefore be appropriate and prudent for conservationists to be looking for replacements to deliver whatever conservation benefits hunting might hitherto have provided (Macdonald, ). Over 2 years following the Cecil incident in 2015, some major importers in Europe and the United States suspended or tightened restrictions on trophy imports (Bauer, Nowell, Sillero‐Zubiri, & Macdonald David, ) and 42 airlines announced or reaffirmed bans on wildlife trophy shipments on their carriers. In the UK, numerous celebrities have twice signed open letters urging the Government to ban the import of trophies into the UK.…”

Addressing the Elephant in the Room: Learning from CITES CoP17

“…Resultantly, CoP17 re-engrained a dyad between activist-oriented conservation claims and kill-to-save sustainable-use advocates in the governance of endangered species (Bauer et al, 2017), contextualising Depledge's assertion that international regimes are prone to ossification, as expressed by 'rancorous relationships, stagnating issues and stifled debates' (2006:1). Indeed, CoP17's outcomes were dependent on scientific expertise to provide a legitimising force, which substantiated moral claims and delegitimised counter-hegemonic narratives (Duffy, 2013:225).…”