2009
DOI: 10.1681/asn.2008060648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LIP5 Interacts with Aquaporin 2 and Facilitates Its Lysosomal Degradation

Abstract: Vasopressin binding to the V2 receptor in renal principal cells leads to activation of protein kinase A, phosphorylation of aquaporin 2 (AQP2) at Ser256, and the translocation of AQP2 to the apical membrane, resulting in concentration of the urine. In contrast, phorbol ester-induced activation of protein kinase C pathway leads to ubiquitination of AQP2 at Lys270 and its internalization to multivesicular bodies, where it is targeted for lysosomal degradation or stored for recycling. Because little is known abou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mutants S256D and S269D had a significantly longer halflife compared to WT-AQP2. From our studies, we cannot determine whether the decreased degradation of 256D-and 269D-AQP2 is due to their decreased internalization and subsequently reduced sorting to the proteolytic pathway or due to a more direct effect such as reduced sorting to the proteolytic pathways via reduced protein-protein interactions; e.g., LIP5 interacts with the COOH-terminal tail of AQP2 (17). In contrast, mutating S264 to either alanine or aspartate resulted in increased AQP2 protein half-life, without significant effects on protein trafficking, suggesting, as previously (6), a more direct role of this residue in sorting AQP2 following endocytic retrieval.…”
Section: Phosphorylation Of Aqp2 Regulates Both Its Endocytosis and Itsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The mutants S256D and S269D had a significantly longer halflife compared to WT-AQP2. From our studies, we cannot determine whether the decreased degradation of 256D-and 269D-AQP2 is due to their decreased internalization and subsequently reduced sorting to the proteolytic pathway or due to a more direct effect such as reduced sorting to the proteolytic pathways via reduced protein-protein interactions; e.g., LIP5 interacts with the COOH-terminal tail of AQP2 (17). In contrast, mutating S264 to either alanine or aspartate resulted in increased AQP2 protein half-life, without significant effects on protein trafficking, suggesting, as previously (6), a more direct role of this residue in sorting AQP2 following endocytic retrieval.…”
Section: Phosphorylation Of Aqp2 Regulates Both Its Endocytosis and Itsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…10 The extension of monoubiquitin by two or three additional ubiquitin moieties (short-chain ubiquitination) apparently participates in the control of AQP2 degradation. 10,11 pUb of AQP2 has not been observed. The signaling processes controlling ubiquitination, and therefore the AQP2 abundance, are largely unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A protein involved in MVB formation is the lysosomal trafficking regulator interacting protein 5 (LIP5). LIP5 is abundantly expressed in the collecting duct (45) and has been shown to interact with AQP2 and facilitate its lysosomal degradation (46).…”
Section: Camentioning
confidence: 99%