2019
DOI: 10.1101/651596
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LiPLike: Towards gene regulatory network predictions of high-certainty

Abstract: Motivation: Reverse engineering of gene regulatory networks has for years struggled with high correlation in expression between regulatory elements. If two regulators have matching expression patterns it is impossible to differentiate between the two, and thus false positive identifications are abundant. Results: To allow for gene regulation predictions of high confidence, we propose a novel method, LiPLike, that assumes a regression model and iteratively searches for interactions that cannot be replaced by a … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed method herein resembles our previously developed method (LASSIM, [2]). The previous method also consisted of a core model used to describe additional constituents of a biological system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The developed method herein resembles our previously developed method (LASSIM, [2]). The previous method also consisted of a core model used to describe additional constituents of a biological system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of large-scale biological data is today often done within the field of bioinformatics using methods to construct biological networks. These networks are often constructed using prior knowledge that can be found in databases, where the interactions in the databases often are classified with a level of confidence [1][2][3][4]. These constructed biological networks can typically not be used to simulate dynamic time-resolved scenarios, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%