“…From included manuscripts (appendix pp 26-33 for study characteristics; appendix p 5 includes full methodological details and results by study), we classified types of upper respiratory tract sampling into four groups: laryngeal swabs (32 studies ), nasopharyngeal aspirate (ten studies [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] ), oral swabs (18 studies [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] ), and other (mouthwash three studies, [71][72][73] nasal swabs one study, 74 saliva four studies, [75][76][77][78] and other mucosa or dental samples three studies [79][80][81] ). Studies were published between May 13, 1933, and Dec 19, 2022, from South Africa (11 studies), Norway (seven studies), UK (seven studies), Peru (four studies), Uganda (seven studies), Canada (three studies), India (three studies), USA (three studies), Australia (two studies), Germany (two studies), Kenya (two studies), and one study from each of Brazil, Chile, China, Slovakia and Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Malawi, Moldova, Mozambique, South Korea, southeast Asia (individual countries not specified), Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, and Yemen.…”