2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2007.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipschitz continuity and local semiconcavity for exit time problems with state constraints

Abstract: In the classical time optimal control problem, it is well known that the so-called Petrov condition is necessary and sufficient for the minimum time function to be locally Lipschitz continuous. In this paper, the same regularity result is obtained in the presence of nonsmooth state constraints. Moreover, for a special class of control systems we obtain a local semiconcavity result for the constrained minimum time function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that, if X is compact, then, thanks to Arzelà-Ascoli Theorem [12, Corollary 3, page X. 19], Lip c (X) is compact. For t ∈ R + , we denote by e t : C X → X the evaluation map e t (γ) = γ(t).…”
Section: Notations and Preliminary Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recall that, if X is compact, then, thanks to Arzelà-Ascoli Theorem [12, Corollary 3, page X. 19], Lip c (X) is compact. For t ∈ R + , we denote by e t : C X → X the evaluation map e t (γ) = γ(t).…”
Section: Notations and Preliminary Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This simplifying assumption is first used when applying Pontryagin Maximum Principle to OCP(X, Γ, k), and, even though it is not strictly needed at this point, as remarked in the beginning of Section 4.3, it is important in Section 4.4 to deduce the semiconcavity of the value function in Proposition 4.18. Indeed, without assumption (e), one must take into account in OCP(X, Γ, k) the state constraint γ(t) ∈ Ω, and value functions of optimal control problems with state constraints may fail to be semiconcave (see, e.g., [19,Example 4.4]).…”
Section: The Mfg Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymptotic behavior of solutions to (1) in various settings can be found in [12,13,15,24]. For local semiconcavity of Hamilton-Jacobi equations with state constraints, see [3,20]. There are also various results regarding semiconcavity of different types of equations, for instance, [1,2,6,17,16,20,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major difficulty in analyzing optimal control problems with state constraints is that their value functions may fail to be semiconcave (see, e.g., [17,Example 4.4]), the latter property being important in the characterization of optimal controls (see, e.g., [18]). In this paper, we rely instead on the techniques introduced in [16] to characterize optimal controls, which do not rely on the semiconcavity of the value function and also allow for weaker regularity assumptions on the dynamics of agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%