1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0248(98)80262-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquation phenomena in CMT melts and structural features in cadmium and mercury tellurides in a liquid phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
16
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This estimation [1] is included for the HgTeand CdTe-limiting cases, as well as for Hg 0.8 Cd 0.2 Te in Figure 8.2, which shows the density-temperature dependence for solid and liquid MCT as reported in the literature. For solid HgTe, it can be seen that this estimation agrees fairy well with the results of Glazov and Pavlova [11,12], and with the trend of the data of Mokrovskii and Regel [13], although the latter values are probably overestimated due to some systematic error as compared to room temperature HgTe density values reported in Figure 8.1 and as discussed by Glazov and Pavlova [11]. For solid CdTe, the above-mentioned estimate [1] is in good agreement with the works of Glazov and Pavlova [11], Gadzhiev et al [6], as well as with the recent statistical assessment of Pavlova et al [7].…”
Section: Variation Of Density With Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This estimation [1] is included for the HgTeand CdTe-limiting cases, as well as for Hg 0.8 Cd 0.2 Te in Figure 8.2, which shows the density-temperature dependence for solid and liquid MCT as reported in the literature. For solid HgTe, it can be seen that this estimation agrees fairy well with the results of Glazov and Pavlova [11,12], and with the trend of the data of Mokrovskii and Regel [13], although the latter values are probably overestimated due to some systematic error as compared to room temperature HgTe density values reported in Figure 8.1 and as discussed by Glazov and Pavlova [11]. For solid CdTe, the above-mentioned estimate [1] is in good agreement with the works of Glazov and Pavlova [11], Gadzhiev et al [6], as well as with the recent statistical assessment of Pavlova et al [7].…”
Section: Variation Of Density With Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For solid CdTe, the above-mentioned estimate [1] is in good agreement with the works of Glazov and Pavlova [11], Gadzhiev et al [6], as well as with the recent statistical assessment of Pavlova et al [7]. Glazov and Pavlova [11] obtained densities from the absorption of penetrating γ -radiation and used a least-squares fit to their experimental data to derive expressions for Glazov and Pavlova [12] 0 (Eqns. 8.3-8.4) Glazov and Pavlova [11] 0 Mokrovskii and Regel [12] 0 Chandra and Holland [14] 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.192, 0.2, 1 (Eqns.…”
Section: Variation Of Density With Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…10 Detailed measurements with small temperature steps allowed us to distinguish a small The most credible, current theoretical models describing structural properties of liquids are based on large-scale, molecular-dynamics simulations, and the supercooled stoichiometric CdTe was also studied by this method. 14,15 However, the effect of stoichiometry deviations on the supercooling was not examined yet. Nevertheless, the results obtained for stoichiometric CdTe can be used for a qualitative explanation of the observed dependence of 1T ¡ on P Cd or x.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%