2002
DOI: 10.2208/jscej.2002.703_327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquefaction Array Observations at Two Sites and Analysis of Their Records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This estimation is based on the assumption that this relationship could be applied throughout the strong motion during the main shock. The linear relationship is confirmed by smaller aftershocks until 20 cm/s of PGV (Nishikawa et al, 2002). Assuming this linear relationship during the main shock on 11 th March 2011, it infer that the landslide was initiated by the complete loss of shear strength at the slip layer caused by an increase of excess pore water pressure during the strong seismic motion.…”
Section: Landslide Movements During Earthquakementioning
confidence: 60%
“…This estimation is based on the assumption that this relationship could be applied throughout the strong motion during the main shock. The linear relationship is confirmed by smaller aftershocks until 20 cm/s of PGV (Nishikawa et al, 2002). Assuming this linear relationship during the main shock on 11 th March 2011, it infer that the landslide was initiated by the complete loss of shear strength at the slip layer caused by an increase of excess pore water pressure during the strong seismic motion.…”
Section: Landslide Movements During Earthquakementioning
confidence: 60%