2001
DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/84.6.1770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid Chromatography/Electrospray Ionization/Isotopic Dilution Mass Spectrometry Analysis of n-(Phosphonomethyl) Glycine and Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Aminomethyl Phosphonic Acid in Environmental Water and Vegetation Matrixes

Abstract: A liquid chromatography/electrospray/mass spectrometry (LC/ES/MS) method was developed for the analysis of glyphosate (n-phosphonomethyl glycine) and its metabolite, aminomethyl phosphonic acid (AMPA) using isotope-labelled glyphosate as a method surrogate. Optimized parameters were achieved to derivatize glyphosate and AMPA using 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC-Cl) in borate buffer prior to a reversedphase LC analysis. Method spike recovery data obtained using laboratory and real world sample matrixes i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly practiced preconcentration method for glyphosate and AMPA and/or their derivatization products (see below) has been the use of solid‐phase extraction (SPE) cartridges and disks, such as C18, HLB and anion exchange cartridges . Other less commonly used methods have included preconcentration in vacuo, by heating/evaporation, using supported liquid membranes, lyophilization and large‐volume sample stacking (LVSS) and field‐enhanced sample injection (FESI) . Following enrichment, clean‐up techniques using ligand, anion and cation exchange resins, alone and in combination, as well as chelating resins, have been reported …”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most commonly practiced preconcentration method for glyphosate and AMPA and/or their derivatization products (see below) has been the use of solid‐phase extraction (SPE) cartridges and disks, such as C18, HLB and anion exchange cartridges . Other less commonly used methods have included preconcentration in vacuo, by heating/evaporation, using supported liquid membranes, lyophilization and large‐volume sample stacking (LVSS) and field‐enhanced sample injection (FESI) . Following enrichment, clean‐up techniques using ligand, anion and cation exchange resins, alone and in combination, as well as chelating resins, have been reported …”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8,18,29,44,85,98,101,108 -123 Corn, soybean and various forage berry species have also been extracted using water/chloroform, 124 -126 whereas water/methanol (with shaking or sonication) was used for extraction of glyphosate and AMPA from Arabidopsis leaves, maize, peas, barley, flax seed, spinach carrot and straw, 118,127 -129 and water/acetone (with shaking or sonication) was used to extract wheat 97 and Lolium multiflorum. 130 Other less commonly used extractants include water/dichloromethane for various plant samples (wheat, olives, tree leaves, tomato, tobacco, beans, turmeric, chili, coriander, coffee, rice, tea, ginger, blackcurrent, hazelnut); 62,80,114,131,132 water/methanol/dichloromethane for cereals; 129 water/EDTA for guava peel; 96 water/NH 2 silica for AMPA in tomato and water/NaH 2 PO 4 /NH 2 silica for glyphosate in tomato; 133 borate buffer for apple. 134 As with water analyses, the majority of which derivatized glyphosate and AMPA prior to analyses, 75% of the reviewed articles in the past 15 years used derivatization in analyses of plant materials (Table 2).…”
Section: Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enrichment of glyphosate by solid-phase extraction on an RP cartridge is carried out to obtain an adequate sensitivity for the analysis of natural water samples. Typically, sample volumes of between 4 mL and 50 mL are solid-phase-extracted on C18modified silica gel or polymeric cartridges and the FMOC derivates are detected in positive or negative ion mode [10,11,14]. The most sensitive methods reach a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 50 ng/L for glyphosate in natural waters [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short reaction times and lower temperatures seem to minimize FMOC-OH formation [16,17]. Some studies have used a time-and solvent-consuming liquid-liquid extraction step for the removal of FMOC-OH after derivatization [18,19], while others removed FMOC-OH during the elution from the SPE cartridge using online coupling of the SPE cartridge to the LC column [14,20]. A fast and effective removal step for the by-products in classical offline SPE is still missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, GC methods remain being used solely due to their analytical parameters, including sensitivity. Nonetheless, LODs of LC and ion chromatographic methods were achieved to be lowered (Mallat & Barceló, 1998;Vreeken, 1998;Bauer et al, 1999;Grey et al, 2001;Patsias et al, 2001;Lee et al, 2002a;Nedelkoska & Low, 2004;Ibáñez et al, 2006;Laitinen et al, 2006;Hanke et al, 2008;Popp et al, 2008) to meet the strictening maximal residue levels (MRLs) in environmental and health regulations. The most recent LC-MS methods using electrospray ionisation (Granby et al, 2003;Martins-Júnior et al, 2011) easily meet the MRL by the EU for given pesticide residues in drinking water, 0.1 µg/l, but the instrumentation demand of these methods is substantial.…”
Section: Residue Analysis Of Glyphosatementioning
confidence: 99%