2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid chromatography–electrospray mass spectrometry determination of ibogaine and noribogaine in human plasma and whole bloodApplication to a poisoning involving Tabernanthe iboga root

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various methodologies for toxicological analysis of ibogaine (molecular weight 310.44) have been previously described, including liquid chromatography with flourimetric detection (71), gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) (72–76) liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC‐MS) (70,75,77–80), and liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS) (81–83). There is a potential for confusion because of the use of two different schemes for numbering the iboga alkaloid parent ibogamine skeleton (84), the Chemical Abstracts system, which is common in the biological and medical literature, and the Le Men and Taylor system, which tends to be favored by natural products and synthetic chemists and is also frequently encountered in the biological literature (see Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methodologies for toxicological analysis of ibogaine (molecular weight 310.44) have been previously described, including liquid chromatography with flourimetric detection (71), gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) (72–76) liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC‐MS) (70,75,77–80), and liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS) (81–83). There is a potential for confusion because of the use of two different schemes for numbering the iboga alkaloid parent ibogamine skeleton (84), the Chemical Abstracts system, which is common in the biological and medical literature, and the Le Men and Taylor system, which tends to be favored by natural products and synthetic chemists and is also frequently encountered in the biological literature (see Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one death (Kontrimaviciute et al, 2006b) involved ingestion of an amount of powdered dried root bark that is at least twice the maximum upper limit used by the providers in this study who are traditional African Bwiti adepts. Other potential hazards may be associated with the lack of pharmaceutical standards for ibogaine, including unregulated procedures for manufacturing and storage or the possibility of naturally co-occurring toxic alkaloids (Singbartl et al, 1973;Jenks, 2002;Kontrimaviciute et al, 2006a).…”
Section: Implications Of the "Vast Uncontrolled Experiment"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects and toxicity of ibogaine seem to be related to its simultaneous action on a group of neurotransmitter systems in the autonomous central nervous system and appear not to be attributable to actions at any single type of receptor, while its mechanism is complex and still only partially understood . Ibogaine has been the subject of several different methods of identification and analysis using chromatographic techniques combined with mass spectrometry/gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) in body fluids in the 1990s , then high‐performance liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (HPLC‐MS) in blood , and more recently HPLC combined with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC‐MS/MS) in body fluids .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%