1984
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450620501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid circulation and mixing characteristics of airlift contactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
87
3
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
10
87
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The total pressure drop in the riser corresponds to the hydrostatic head and is related to riser gas holdup. The riser gas holdup measurement was verified by use of the bed expansion method to ensure its accuracy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The total pressure drop in the riser corresponds to the hydrostatic head and is related to riser gas holdup. The riser gas holdup measurement was verified by use of the bed expansion method to ensure its accuracy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The use of two identical probes eliminates the need to consider the response time of the electrodes. 1,5,[13][14][15][16] The potassium chloride salt solution used as a tracer to determine the superficial liquid velocity has been shown in previous bubble column studies to significantly affect bubble coalescence and gas holdup, particularly in the transition region from homogeneous to heterogeneous flow. 13 Jamialahmadi and Muller-Steinhagen 17 and Zahradnik et al 18 evaluated the effect of salt on reactor hydrodynamics using salt concentrations that ranged from 0.005 to 0.15 g/cm 3 and reported that reactor hydrodynamics were not affected for the lowest concentrations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For any input operational conditions maximal productivity of the reactor is only guaranteed in the point of the target GLR optimal geometry. The GLR model proposed employs tanks-in-series mixing model sketched in Figure 6 to combine hydrodynamics of a real GLR (Bello, et al (1984), Blažej, et al (2004, Sikula, et al (2007), , Sikula & Markoš (2008) ) and the kinetics of the model reaction from Section 1.1. This GLR model is much simpler and a bit more realistic than that of Kluytmans, et al (2003) who employed axial dispersion mixing model with hydrodynamics measured in small-scale 2D bubblecolumn reactor and considered intra-particle diffusion.…”
Section: Natural Periodic Operation Of Glrmentioning
confidence: 99%