“…Moreover, the device even maintained good areal energy density of 0.26 mWh cm −2 at high power density 27.22 mW cm −2 . Impressively, the obtained energy and power density values of this HSC are comparable or even higher than the previously reported asymmetric SCs/HSCs, such as hierarchical Ni‐Co‐S NSs//graphene (0.118 mWh cm −2 at 10.4 mW cm −2 ), Ag@Ce 6 Mo 10 O 39 //AC (0.0183 mWh cm −2 at 0.739 mW cm −2 ), core–shell‐like NiCo 2 S 4 hierarchical structures//activated carbon (0.121 mWh cm −2 at 0.941 mW cm −2 ), Ni‐Co‐S nanoflakes//polypyrrole (0.112 mWh cm −2 at 1.5 mW cm −2 ), Ni 0.8 Cu 0.2 ‐S nanostructures//N‐doped graphene (0.138 mWh cm −2 at 6.4 mW cm −2 ), Ni‐Mo‐S//Ni‐Fe‐S (0.228 mWh cm −2 at 1.58 mW cm −2 ), Ni 3 S 2 @CdS//porous carbon (0.259 mWh cm −2 at 1.482 mW cm −2 ), Zn‐Ni‐P//Fe 2 O 3 @NG (0.346 mWh cm −2 at 2.37 mW cm −2 ), core–shell CoMoO 4 @Co(OH) 2 //porous carbon (0.167 mWh cm −2 at 1.5 mW cm −2 ), CoNi 2 S 4 /Ni 3 S 2 @Ni(OH) 2 //active carbon (0.432 mWh cm −2 at 1.646 mW cm −2 ), and MnCo 2 S 4 //rGO (0.25 mWh cm −2 at 6.4 mW cm −2 ), respectively. Moreover, the comparative results of our HSC with many other reports are also summarized in Table S2 (Supporting Information).…”