2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2015.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liquid–liquid extraction in microchannels and conventional stage-wise extractors: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate feasibility of the slug flow microreactor, the volumetric mass transfer coefficients ( k L α) are contrasted with other microreactors and traditional reactors in Figure . It is obvious that k L α of slug flow microreactor is much higher than those of other extractors . Among these microreactors, the k L α of hollow fiber supported liquid membrane (HFSLM) is the largest, followed by Y‐Y microchip, then hollow fiber contactor, and the maximum k L α of the T‐shaped microreactor measured by our group is 0.043 s −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…To evaluate feasibility of the slug flow microreactor, the volumetric mass transfer coefficients ( k L α) are contrasted with other microreactors and traditional reactors in Figure . It is obvious that k L α of slug flow microreactor is much higher than those of other extractors . Among these microreactors, the k L α of hollow fiber supported liquid membrane (HFSLM) is the largest, followed by Y‐Y microchip, then hollow fiber contactor, and the maximum k L α of the T‐shaped microreactor measured by our group is 0.043 s −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Microfluidic extraction can be categorized into two types according to flow pattern, i.e., co-laminar microfluidic extraction and droplet-based microfluidic extraction. Experiments on both configurations have proved that the microfluidics is a highly efficient approach to achieve extraction equilibrium in much shorter time compared with traditional bulk devices [6][7][8][9][10]. In a co-laminar microfluidic extraction system, since aqueous and organic streams flow side by side, it is convenient to achieve phase separation at the outlet.…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, progress on the development of micro-reactor and micromixers with the sub-millimeter scales provides high mass transfer rate because of their large surface-to-volume ratio and the short transport path [1][2][3]. Owing to vast application field of microfluidic systems, it is important that mixing performance and mass transfer characterizes of these devices have been evaluated as these issues are essential part of chemical processes [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%