Rivers of Europe 2009
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-369449-2.00022-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

List of Contributors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into consideration that the Tulcea branch accounts for 45% of the total Danube discharge, all fluxes were upscaled to 100% to derive fluxes for the entire river as it enters the delta. This results in a water discharge of 10,100/7,800 m 3 /s (2013/2014, respectively), significantly above the average yearly discharge of 6,486 m 3 /s in both years (Sommerwerk et al, 2009). In 2013, the discharge was close to the average annual flood discharge of 10,889 m 3 /s.…”
Section: Implications For Oc Export To the Black Seamentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Taking into consideration that the Tulcea branch accounts for 45% of the total Danube discharge, all fluxes were upscaled to 100% to derive fluxes for the entire river as it enters the delta. This results in a water discharge of 10,100/7,800 m 3 /s (2013/2014, respectively), significantly above the average yearly discharge of 6,486 m 3 /s in both years (Sommerwerk et al, 2009). In 2013, the discharge was close to the average annual flood discharge of 10,889 m 3 /s.…”
Section: Implications For Oc Export To the Black Seamentioning
confidence: 90%