It is argued that the sensitive management of time lapses or timing should be an important part of conventional communicative approaches in the L2 classroom. Distinctions must be made between timing and silence and between different types of teacher-managed time lapses. Suggestions for classroom application are drawn from a wide range of current theoretical and research perspectives.The purpose of this article is to isolate the factors that affect timing in conventional communicative classrooms, to summarize research evidence on the significance of timing, and to identify some of the contexts where timing should be a consideration.
Some Empirical EvidenceThe empirical evidence on timing in L2 learning is limited. Let us assume that the learner usually has to process a language cue, retrieve information, and formulate a response that is then to be articulated. A typical routine might include a teacher's question requiring the understanding of a text and a learner response. In such cases, Holley and King (1971) found that teachers generally cut short learner hesitations or incorrect responses. Similarly, van Lier (1988) concluded that teachers are often too hasty in their interventions, not allowing learners time to self-correct or rephrase what they have said. White and Lightbown (1984) found that the average wait time was around 2.1 seconds, a finding similar to Rowe's 11 results (1987). Shrum and Tech (1985) observed target L2language wait times to average around 1.9 seconds, shorter than the L1 time of 2.3 seconds. The L2 and L1 postresponse wait times (Rowe's wait time 2) were both 0.7 seconds, with some variation according to the task.When wait times are increased there are numerous benefits to both teachers and learners. Rowe (1987) found that teachers become more flexible and ask fewer questions; moreover, the questions they ask tend to be more relevant and interesting. She lists the following benefits for learners: longer responses, use of more supporting evidence, more speculation, more questions, fewer response failures, more peer exchanges, greater variety of par-46 ANTHONY BRUTON ticipation, more confidence, and greater achievement. Holley and King (1971) point out that silence takes up less time than rephrasing, correcting, and explaining. Ellis (1987) showed that having more time results in greater accuracy in the production of regular past tense forms, and Crookes (1989) noted that learners use a wider variety of language when they are given sufficient time.
Being Silent and Having Time to ThinkWe consider three factors that affect having time to process language. These are types of response, contributors in the classroom, and length of time lapses in interactions. We can differentiate between conspicuous verbal and nonverbal responses. This distinction can explain why the mere presence of silence does not necessarily mean that a learner has time to assimilate input. In some TPR experiences, for instance, learners may be expected to respond before they have really discriminated the linguistic cue...