A long and irreversible plateau is observed for Li 1.12 ͑Ni 0.425 Mn 0.425 Co 0.15 ͒ 0.88 O 2 . The layered Li y ͑Ni 0.425 Mn 0.425 Co 0.15 ͒ 0.88 O 2 ͑y = 0.93 and 0.73͒ materials were prepared by discharging to 3.2 V Li//Li y ͑Ni 0.425 Mn 0.425 Co 0.15 ͒ 0.88 O 2 cells charged up to 4.4 V ͑beginning of the plateau͒ and 4.8 V ͑end of the plateau͒, respectively. The structure was investigated using the combination of X-ray and electron diffraction experiments to study a possible structural evolution upon cycling of the superstructure observed for the pristine material. The disappearance of the superlattice lines in the 19.5-34°͑2 Cu ͒ range in the X-ray diffraction pattern as well as that of the diffuse disorder scattering lines ͑or the extra spots͒ in the electron diffraction patterns were clearly observed for Li 0.73 ͑Ni 0.425 Mn 0.425 Co 0.15 ͒ 0.88 O 2 . These results revealed the loss of the ͱ 3·a hex. ϫ ͱ 3·a hex. superstructure and thus of the cation ordering within the slabs when the Li//Li 1.12 ͑Ni 0.425 Mn 0.425 Co 0.15 ͒ 0.88 O 2 cells are charged to the end of the plateau. Moreover, other new diffuse disorder scattering lines were observed along the c * axis itself for the Li 0.73 ͑Ni 0.425 Mn 0.425 Co 0.15 ͒ 0.88 O 2 material that has seen the plateau, which were attributed to local interslab space thickness variations. ͒O 2 ͑x = 0, x = 1/6͒ materials have made these layered materials recognized as promising positive electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries due to their high reversible capacity and their very good safety characteristics. 1-3 Since then, many reports have addressed these types of compounds. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] As reported in previous papers, 18-20 the structure of the Li 1+x ͑Ni 0.425 Mn 0.425 Co 0.15 ͒ 1−x O 2 phases was carefully characterized in our lab by the combination of X-ray, neutron, and electron diffraction. The X-ray and neutron diffraction data showed a decreasing nickel amount in the interslab space and an increasing lithium amount in the slab with increasing overlithiation ͑x͒. Electron diffraction results indicated for the Li 1+x ͑Ni 0.425 Mn 0.425 Co 0.15 ͒ 1−x O 2 ͑x = 0 and 0.12͒ materials the presence of an in-plane ͱ 3·a hex. ϫ ͱ 3·a hex. superstructure in the slabs, which was previously suggested by the presence of small diffraction lines observed in the 19.5-34°͑2 Cu ͒ range in their X-ray diffraction ͑XRD͒ patterns. 20 Due to the material stoichiometry and to their difference in size ͓r͑Li + ͒ = 0.72 Å, r͑Co 3+ ͒ = 0.53 Å; r͑Mn 4+ ͒ = 0.54 Å, r͑Ni 2+ ͒ = 0.69 Å, and r͑Ni 3+ ͒ = 0.56 Å͔, the cations present in the slabs for Li 1+x ͑Ni 0.425 Mn 0.425 Co 0.15 ͒ 1−x O 2 were shown to be ordered among two distinct sites, ␣ and , to minimize the constraints: the large Li + and Ni 2+ ions were expected to occupy the ␣ site while the small Mn 4+ , Ni 3+ and Co 3+ ions should occupy the  site. Note that due to a ratio between the amounts of large and small cations present in the slabs, significantly different from one-half e...