“…The resistances and kinetic barrier to Li + would increase as temperature goes down, and numerous studies have been seeking the reduction of these resistances so as to improve the low-temperature capability of LIBs. Successful strategies include employing low-freezing-point solvents like ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC), propylene carbonate (PC), and diethyl carbonate, − and co-solvents like 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl- N -caproate and carboxylate esters, , utilization of various lithium salts combinations such as lithium oxalyldifluoroborate/lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF 4 ), lithium bis(oxalato)borate/LiBF 4 ; − and the other additional additives like lithium-modified silica nanosalt. , Although improvement was achieved, the fundamental mechanism behind the origin of reduced resistances remains unclear, and controversies often arise. It has been noted early on that bulk ion conductivity of electrolyte may not be the limiting factor determining the low-temperature performance of an LIB; ,, instead, Li + migration across the SEI might be the most sluggish step. ,, Xu et al , and Abe et al independently proposed that Li + ion transfer barrier through the interface of electrolyte/electrode is overwhelmed by the Li + desolvation process before intercalating into graphite interlayers.…”