2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2016.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithium-silica nanosalt as a low-temperature electrolyte additive for lithium-ion batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resistances and kinetic barrier to Li + would increase as temperature goes down, and numerous studies have been seeking the reduction of these resistances so as to improve the low-temperature capability of LIBs. Successful strategies include employing low-freezing-point solvents like ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC), propylene carbonate (PC), and diethyl carbonate, and co-solvents like 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl- N -caproate and carboxylate esters, , utilization of various lithium salts combinations such as lithium oxalyldifluoroborate/lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF 4 ), lithium bis­(oxalato)­borate/LiBF 4 ; and the other additional additives like lithium-modified silica nanosalt. , Although improvement was achieved, the fundamental mechanism behind the origin of reduced resistances remains unclear, and controversies often arise. It has been noted early on that bulk ion conductivity of electrolyte may not be the limiting factor determining the low-temperature performance of an LIB; ,, instead, Li + migration across the SEI might be the most sluggish step. ,, Xu et al , and Abe et al independently proposed that Li + ion transfer barrier through the interface of electrolyte/electrode is overwhelmed by the Li + desolvation process before intercalating into graphite interlayers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resistances and kinetic barrier to Li + would increase as temperature goes down, and numerous studies have been seeking the reduction of these resistances so as to improve the low-temperature capability of LIBs. Successful strategies include employing low-freezing-point solvents like ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC), propylene carbonate (PC), and diethyl carbonate, and co-solvents like 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl- N -caproate and carboxylate esters, , utilization of various lithium salts combinations such as lithium oxalyldifluoroborate/lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF 4 ), lithium bis­(oxalato)­borate/LiBF 4 ; and the other additional additives like lithium-modified silica nanosalt. , Although improvement was achieved, the fundamental mechanism behind the origin of reduced resistances remains unclear, and controversies often arise. It has been noted early on that bulk ion conductivity of electrolyte may not be the limiting factor determining the low-temperature performance of an LIB; ,, instead, Li + migration across the SEI might be the most sluggish step. ,, Xu et al , and Abe et al independently proposed that Li + ion transfer barrier through the interface of electrolyte/electrode is overwhelmed by the Li + desolvation process before intercalating into graphite interlayers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, the graphite|LiCoO 2 full‐cell exhibited higher capacity retention of 81 % at −20 °C in the electrolyte (i. e., 1.0 M LiPF 6 in EC/PC/DEC/EMC/VC/FEC) with 1 % PDMS‐A (Figure 6d). This is because the modified electrolyte has adequate ionic conductivities of ∼0.2 mS cm −1 and a lower interface impedance of 4.4 Ω at −20 °C (Figure 6c) [76a,b] . Besides, the electrochemical stability can be improved to over 5.5 V and the interface impedance could achieve as low as 2.4 Ω at −20 °C when the PDMS‐A and Li‐SiO 2 were used together (Figure 6c).…”
Section: Additivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…79 A particularly unique design comes from Ko et al, who reported on a lithium-modified silica nanosalt (''Li202'') synthesized by treating hydrophobic silica with LiH, followed by 1,3-propane sultone. 85 The resulting sulfonate-rich surface allowed the silica to form a stable dispersion (2.5 wt%) with an electrolyte solution of 1 M LiPF 6 in EC/PC/EMC/DEC 20 : 5 : 55 : 20 v/v + 2 wt% vinylene carbonate (VC). The presence of Li202 additive slightly improved the cycling performance of Gr8LiCoO 2 coin cells at À20 1C when compared to the electrolyte alone and a non-functionalized silica dispersion.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%