2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12040-021-01792-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithofacies and fluid prediction of a sandstone reservoir using pre-stack inversion and non-parametric statistical classification: A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the impedance values for hydrocarbon-bearing sands typically fall within the range of 17,500 to 21,500 (ft/s)*(g/cc), while water-bearing sands are found in the range of 22,000 to 24,500 (ft/s)*(g/cc). Shale encompasses values spanning from 24,500 to 27,500 (ft/s)*(g/cc) [56,58]. However, we would like to point out that this categorization is beyond the primary scope of this study, where we treated AI as individual data samples.…”
Section: Seismic Data Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the impedance values for hydrocarbon-bearing sands typically fall within the range of 17,500 to 21,500 (ft/s)*(g/cc), while water-bearing sands are found in the range of 22,000 to 24,500 (ft/s)*(g/cc). Shale encompasses values spanning from 24,500 to 27,500 (ft/s)*(g/cc) [56,58]. However, we would like to point out that this categorization is beyond the primary scope of this study, where we treated AI as individual data samples.…”
Section: Seismic Data Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%