1996
DOI: 10.1071/mf9960737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Litter production and accumulation in stressed mangrove communities in the Embley River estuary, north-eastern Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia

Abstract: From March 1993 to March 1994, the three main mangrove communities in the Embley River Estuary (12�37'S, 141�52'E) were studied: Rhizophora forest in the main river channel and in a small creek, and Ceriops forest and Avicennia forest in a small creek. In November 1993, all A. marina trees in the main river channel lost their leaves, and some understorey species in Avicennia forests in tributaries died; this is attributed to environmental stress. This defoliation and death continued for at least a year. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At all five forests, litter accumulation rates were rapid (48.8-70.4 Mg DW ha À1 yr À1 ) compared with measurements made in other mangrove forests (Conacher et al 1996, Schories et al 2003, Roy 2011, Abib and Appadoo 2012, and no other mangrove studies have measured rates of accumulation several times greater than litter fall as crabs and other detritivorous fauna ordinarily consume large amounts of litter (Cannicci et al 2008). The large standing stocks and accumulation rates of litter in the forest floor reflect not only high litter production but low detritivore numbers and also the fact that we have observed input of litter tidally advected from forests closer to the sea edge and piled as tidal lines within our plots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…At all five forests, litter accumulation rates were rapid (48.8-70.4 Mg DW ha À1 yr À1 ) compared with measurements made in other mangrove forests (Conacher et al 1996, Schories et al 2003, Roy 2011, Abib and Appadoo 2012, and no other mangrove studies have measured rates of accumulation several times greater than litter fall as crabs and other detritivorous fauna ordinarily consume large amounts of litter (Cannicci et al 2008). The large standing stocks and accumulation rates of litter in the forest floor reflect not only high litter production but low detritivore numbers and also the fact that we have observed input of litter tidally advected from forests closer to the sea edge and piled as tidal lines within our plots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Mangrove litter fall are measured and the content of the litter is analysed. The range of the volume of the litter fall varies from species to species, habitat to habitat depending on the seasonal variations (Imbart and Menard 1997;Saenger 1998;Conacher et al 1996). Detritus contributes about 60 % of the primary production in the mangrove ecosystems.…”
Section: Mangrove Littermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…forests. The mangrove surface area up to 1 m above the substrate in the Rhizophora community was about 250 times the surface area of mangrove in the Ceriops community and about 550 times that in the Avicennia community (Conacher et al 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%