2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Live-Load Moment-Distribution Factors for an Adjacent Precast Prestressed Concrete Box Beam Bridge with Reinforced UHPC Shear Key Connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gheitasi and Harris [8] show an overestimation of the stresses obtained when using the LDF quantified as 125% for interior girders and greater than 300% for exterior girders. Likewise, Huang, Semendary and Razzaq [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] quantify the overestimation of the longitudinal bending stresses experienced by the girders obtained using the LDF method as 150%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gheitasi and Harris [8] show an overestimation of the stresses obtained when using the LDF quantified as 125% for interior girders and greater than 300% for exterior girders. Likewise, Huang, Semendary and Razzaq [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] quantify the overestimation of the longitudinal bending stresses experienced by the girders obtained using the LDF method as 150%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural grillage models [2][3][4] are commonly used to calculate the cross-sectional distribution of live loads between the different girders making up the cross section of the deck [5][6][7]. Another way to approach the design and calculation of such decks would be to apply different formulations [8][9][10] contained in the bridge design standards that approximate the cross-sectional distribution of the bending moment and shear stress caused by live loads through what is known as the load distribution factor (LDF) [11][12][13]. The LDF associated with each case study is conditioned by the type and number of girders, their spacing and length, and whether there are transverse diaphragms that provide the deck with transverse rigidity [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By determining the right side of equations (7) and (8) for the relative displacement, the tangent sti ness is as follows:…”
Section: Bonding Model Of Reinforcedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Box girder is an important type of bridge structure. For box girder, many scholars have conducted research on shear lag, effective width [1][2][3][4][5], and live load distribution factors [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very common to use structural grillage models [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] to calculate the cross-sectional distribution of live loads between the different beams that make up the cross section of the deck. Another way to deal with the design and calculation of such decks would be to apply different formulations contained in the bridge design standards that allow approximating the cross-sectional distribution of the bending moment and shear stress caused by live loads through what is known as the load distribution factor "LDF" [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The "LDF" associated with each case study is conditioned by the type and number of beams, their spacing and length, as well as the existence or not of transverse diaphragms that bring transverse rigidity to the deck.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%