2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11842-017-9367-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Livelihood Strategies and Forest Product Utilisation of Rural Households in Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low dependence of households with more physical assets on forest income may be because households with more physical assets have access to other sources of income than the forests [55,56]. These results are in line with the finding of [57] who found that households with more assets depend less on forest income and extract less income from forests. The findings were also consistent in all five sub-divisions of the district (Table 4).…”
Section: Households' Assets Status and Forest Incomesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The low dependence of households with more physical assets on forest income may be because households with more physical assets have access to other sources of income than the forests [55,56]. These results are in line with the finding of [57] who found that households with more assets depend less on forest income and extract less income from forests. The findings were also consistent in all five sub-divisions of the district (Table 4).…”
Section: Households' Assets Status and Forest Incomesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This would explain why female-headed households extracted wild vegetables at a higher intensity for home consumption. Our findings are consistent with other studies which show limited engagement in commercial-based forest livelihood among women (Lax and K€ othke 2017;Rasmussen et al 2017;Imfumu and Lukoki 2020). In addition, other studies also show that men often dominate the governing jurisdiction over forest resources implying differential access, which may disadvantage women (Lidestav 2010;Mai et al 2019).…”
Section: Nature Extent Of Forest Extractionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…One of the executive members of a CFUG reported that out of 26 households in one hamlet, only two collected firewood from the CF and the remaining households from trees growing on their own farmland, consistent with what was reported in other parts of Nepal (Webb and Dhakal 2011).The low value of firewood and availability of alternate fuel sources (e.g. LPG) means that firewood collection is strongly influenced by a household's proximity to forest blocks (Davidar et al 2010;Deng et al 2011;Fikir et al 2016;Lax and Köthke 2017).…”
Section: Underlying Causes Of Decreasing Household Consumption Of Fir...supporting
confidence: 65%