“…The hotly debated and divisive Charter of Values in Québec and its rewriting (re/righting) of the history curriculum is another recent example (Curtis, 2013;Either, Cardin, & Lefrançois, 2013). Despite such ongoing politically enacted limit---situations (Freire, 1970(Freire, /1990 continue to invite us to revisit the concept of multiculturalism as a polyphony of lines of movement that grow in the abundance of conjunctive middles, the "betweens," or the doubling of cosmopolitan "hyph---e---nations" that some first generation immigrant youth continue to experience as "third spaces" within the contexts of public schooling (Ausman, 2011;Lewkowich, 2009Lewkowich, , 2012Pinar, 2009;Johnston & Richardson, 2012; Ng---A---Fook, Radford, Ausman, 2012;Watt, 2011). And yet, regardless of such debates, the abundance of different contextual meanings reminds us that normative, performative, material, and psychic notions of "nation" and "multiculturalism" are perpetually shifting and often tremble ontologically with postmodern uncertainty when we utter their names in relation to provoking questions about the very "idea" of Canadian curriculum studies.…”