The main goal of the special issue on 'the interplay between collective memory and the erosion of nation states: The paradigmatic case of Belgium' is to examine the erosion of the Belgian State as an exemplary illustration of the way memories of past events can influence current attitudes, emotions, representations and behaviours. We believe that the recent political crisis in Belgium, with no government for more than one year after the 2010 general elections, could be partly illuminated by the diverging and sometimes contradictory memories each linguistic group (Dutch-vs. French-speakers) in Belgium holds about the past. These issues will be examined through different disciplines from the social sciences and humanities: social psychology, history, psychoanalysis, political sciences, and literature.
KeywordsBelgium, collective memory, collective emotions
Memory Studies 5(1)Throughout the world, we are currently confronted with the erosion of nation states as independentist or separatist movements question the consensus on national identities. Many explanations for these changes can be put forward. One such explanation may stem from diverging collective memories. Collective memories may play a crucial role in these conflicts as they serve to justify conflicting parties' motives and aspirations. By defining what the nation was, it also projects an image of what it should be (Hilton and Liu, 2008). Thus, political conflicts surrounding the integrity of nation states systematically involve conflict of memories (e.g. Licata et al., 2007;Rosoux, 2004). As we will see below, these conflicts most often include the ignorance -or the rejection -of the other group's memory. Beyond its scientific interest, understanding these conflicts of memories is practical as well: such an understanding may lead to a better understanding of the processes and factors that impede or facilitate the outburst of violence as a result of these mnemonic conflicts.
Belgium: Some history and background knowledgeA fruitful strategy for addressing the complex relations between collective memory and political conflicts surrounding the viability of modern nation states involves considering these relations in a specific national context. In this respect, Belgium is a particularly relevant country for examining this question. Independent since 1830 (see Hirst and Fineberg, this issue, for a more extensive historical overview), Belgium is a relatively small (approximately the size of Massachusetts), but densely populated, western European country composed of two main linguistic groups, the French and the Dutch speakers, plus a small German-speaking population. The definition of Belgium as a nation, and identification with this nation, have fuelled debates and conflicts between the two main linguistic groups for decades. The erosion of Belgium's nation state is therefore a long process. From being a purely centralized state at its start in 1830 and until 1970, Belgium became a federal state through a series of steps in which the cultural/lingui...