Living Near to Attractive Nature? A Well-Being Indicator for Ranking Dutch, Danish, and German Functional Urban Areas

Abstract

While nature is widely acknowledged to contribute to people’s well-being, nature based well-being indicators at city-level appear to be underprovided. This study aims at filling this gap by introducing a novel indicator based on the proximity of city-residents to nature that is of high-amenity. High-amenity nature is operationalized by combining unique systematic data on people’s perceptions of what are the locations of attractive natural areas with data on natural land cover. The proposed indicator departs from the usual assumption of equal well-being from any nature, as it approximates the ‘actual’ subjective quality of nature near people’s homes in a spatially explicit way. Such indicator is used to rank 148 ‘cities’ in the Netherlands, Denmark, and Germany. International comparability of the indicator is enhanced by the use of a definition of cities as functional urban areas (FUAs), which are consistently identified across countries. Results demonstrate that the average ‘nearness’ of FUA populations to high amenity nature varies widely across the observed FUAs. A key finding, that complements insights from existing city-level indicators, is that while populations of FUAs with higher population densities may live relatively far from nature in general, they also live, on average, closer to high-amenity nature than inhabitants of lower density FUAs. Our results may stimulate policy-debates on how to combine urban agglomeration with access to natural amenities in order to account for people’s wellbeing.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1375-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Investment obstacles to sustainable development and competitiveness index

“…These findings are consistent with those of Popkiewicz (2016) and Daams and Veneri (2017), who stated that obstacles to SDGs can be mitigated by improving the well-being of individuals in society. Repetti and Desthieux (2006) pointed out that the social dimension is reflected strongly in indicators of sustainable development, while noting that individuals evaluate products and services provided to them to highlight strengths and weaknesses, which contributes to the promotion and improvement of SDGs (Vörösmarty et al , 2018).…”

“…Daams and Veneri (2017) indicated that strengthening companies' financial positions and abilities to bear costs contributes to building the welfare of society and addressing social issues. The income determinants are an impediment to achieving the welfare of societies because individuals cannot increase consumption (Brewer and O'Dea, 2012).…”

“…Furthermore, a fiscal policy deficit is determined by the government's activities in financing economic operations in the future. This encourages inflation and thus impedes the process of sustainable development, and it also complicates knowledge of how to manage public sector accounts (Daams and Veneri, 2017).…”

“…Health and primary education (HPE): Productivity and competitiveness are determined strongly in the health sector. Therefore, poor communities face a problem in terms of the growth of their institutions as they do not have sufficient resources in light of the high costs in the business sector (Daams and Veneri, 2017). Therefore, creating healthy working conditions is important for increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of production and improving the quality level (Lorgelly, 2015).…”

Marketing and branding-oriented goals for the development of Functional Urban Areas: evidence from Poland

“…The unpredictable character of the ever-changing environment, which is particular to European cities, is gaining greater interest among researchers and practitioners (Kavaratzis, 2004). The urbanisation of a growing number of areas makes it increasingly more important to monitor the local amenities that affect the quality of life of urban residents (Daams et al, 2016). On a global scale, city councils strive to manage their territorial brand and correctly identify their niche to increase the visibility of their areas (Judd, 1995;Markusen & Schrock, 2006;quoted in: Hultman et al, 2016).…”