2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71246-8_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LKT-FM: A Novel Rating Pattern Transfer Model for Improving Non-overlapping Cross-Domain Collaborative Filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These experimental results are counter intuitive, because we expect no improvement from CrossFire when the source and the target domains are identical -indeed, there should be no useful checkin patterns to be transfered from the source domain to the target one, as no new information has been obtained. Note that none of previous works [12,13,15,20] on non-overlapping CDCF reports the effectiveness of their proposed approaches when setting the source domain equal to the target domain. In response to research question RQ1, our experimental results demonstrate that the CBT-based strategy of CrossFire does not clearly contribute to the improvements of the recommendation accuracy, compared to the traditional single-domain MF-based models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These experimental results are counter intuitive, because we expect no improvement from CrossFire when the source and the target domains are identical -indeed, there should be no useful checkin patterns to be transfered from the source domain to the target one, as no new information has been obtained. Note that none of previous works [12,13,15,20] on non-overlapping CDCF reports the effectiveness of their proposed approaches when setting the source domain equal to the target domain. In response to research question RQ1, our experimental results demonstrate that the CBT-based strategy of CrossFire does not clearly contribute to the improvements of the recommendation accuracy, compared to the traditional single-domain MF-based models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The venue recommendation task is thus to rank those 101 venues for each user, aiming to rank highest the recent, ground truth checkin/rating. Note that previous works [12,13,15,20] on nonoverlapping CDCF use Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) to evaluate the quality of rating prediction. In contrast, we evaluate the quality of recommendation in terms of Hit Ratio (HR) 6 and Normalised Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG) on the ranked lists of venues -as applied in previous studies [10,23,24].…”
Section: Datasets and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations