2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/281681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LMI-Based Stability Criterion for Impulsive CGNNs via Fixed Point Theory

Abstract: Linear matrices inequalities (LMIs) method and the contraction mapping theorem were employed to prove the existence of globally exponentially stable trivial solution for impulsive Cohen-Grossberg neural networks (CGNNs). It is worth mentioning that it is the first time to use the contraction mapping theorem to prove the stability for CGNNs while only the Leray-Schauder fixed point theorem was applied in previous related literature. An example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods due… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can also understand from Remark 1 that we proposed in this paper a really feasible new condition on amplification function and behavior function . This implies that our result and methods are novelty versus [18,Theorem 4]. Besides, our conditions and result are also different from those of existing literature [17,[19][20][21][22]] (see below " Table 1" and "Remark 13").…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One can also understand from Remark 1 that we proposed in this paper a really feasible new condition on amplification function and behavior function . This implies that our result and methods are novelty versus [18,Theorem 4]. Besides, our conditions and result are also different from those of existing literature [17,[19][20][21][22]] (see below " Table 1" and "Remark 13").…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Remark 5. Since (H4) is replaced with (A3), the methods of [18] cannot be applied to this paper, and we have to formulate new contraction mapping, different from [18]. Definition 6.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations