2011
DOI: 10.1109/jproc.2011.2157885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load Balancing and QoS Provisioning Based on Congestion Prediction for GEO/LEO Hybrid Satellite Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, TLR still bears the risk of cascaded congestion as ELB does. In addition to these schemes, Nishiyama and colleagues [23][24][25] introduced some load balancing routing schemes for Multi-Layer Satellite Networks. The purpose of these schemes is to enable each satellite to transfer packets with fewer hops via the LEO layer and to transfer packets with more hops via the MEO layer or Geosynchronous Earth Orbit (GEO) layer.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, TLR still bears the risk of cascaded congestion as ELB does. In addition to these schemes, Nishiyama and colleagues [23][24][25] introduced some load balancing routing schemes for Multi-Layer Satellite Networks. The purpose of these schemes is to enable each satellite to transfer packets with fewer hops via the LEO layer and to transfer packets with more hops via the MEO layer or Geosynchronous Earth Orbit (GEO) layer.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have proposed load balancing routing schemes [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] to improve this situation. Among these schemes, two strategies are commonly used: global strategy and local strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SLSN is shown to be inefficient with respect to data transmissions [1]. To address this issue, in the past two decades, multi-layered satellite network (MLSN) has been proposed by a number of researchers [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this routing strategy leads to a high packet drop rate and high queuing delay, which means the queuing delay must be taken into consideration. Consequently, [4] begins to take the expected queuing delay and congestion status into account when computing the optimal route for packet transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%