1997
DOI: 10.1080/001401397188035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load knowledge affects low-back loading and control of balance in lifting tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A memorized representation of that balance, derived from the previous lifting movement, could be used to accomplish that adjustment. In support of that possibility, Commissaris and Toussaint (1997a) have shown that information obtained in previous lifts is used in scaling anticipatory actions. The use of a memorized representation, therefore, involves central control.…”
Section: Effects Of Repetitive Lifting Onmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A memorized representation of that balance, derived from the previous lifting movement, could be used to accomplish that adjustment. In support of that possibility, Commissaris and Toussaint (1997a) have shown that information obtained in previous lifts is used in scaling anticipatory actions. The use of a memorized representation, therefore, involves central control.…”
Section: Effects Of Repetitive Lifting Onmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For instance, researchers examining trunk musculature activation during occupational lifting found greater EMG responses when loads were unexpectedly altered prior to the lift when compared to lifts in which the load magnitude was known (De Looze et al 2000;Shapiro et al 2002). In addition, lifts were likely to be completed more rapidly if the load characteristics were not known (or incorrectly judged) during the preparation for a lift (Commisaris and Toussaint 1997). The effect of altered muscle activation (EMG responses) produced by uncertainty are speculated to result from the lack of knowledge causing an overestimation of the load, increasing the likelihood that the lifter applies a larger-than-necessary force to move the real load (Commisaris and Toussaint 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lumbar loading during lifting has been analyzed using force plates and optical 3-D movement analysis system in combination with biomechanical models [3], [17], [18]. More recently, a combination of electromyography (EMG), inertial sensor measurements of body movements and biomechanical modeling, was proposed for estimating lumbar loading, without actually measuring the mechanical interaction with the load or the ground [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%