Load-settlement response of a footing over buried conduit in a sloping terrain: a numerical experiment-based artificial intelligent approach

Abstract

Settlement estimation of a footing located over a buried conduit in a sloping terrain is a challenging task for practicing civil/geotechnical engineers. In the recent past, the advent of machine learning technology has made many traditional approaches antiquated. This paper investigates the viability, development, implementation, and comprehensive comparison of five artificial intelligence-based machine learning models, namely, multi-layer perceptron (MLP), Gaussian processes regression (GPR), lazy K-Star (LKS), decision table (DT), and random forest (RF) to estimate the settlement of footing located over a buried conduit within a soil slope. The pertaining dataset of 3600 observations was obtained by conducting large-scale numerical simulations via the finite element modelling framework. After executing the feature selection technique that is correlation-based subset selection, the applied load, total unit weight of soil, constrained modulus of soil, slope angle ratio, hoop stiffness of conduit, bending stiffness of conduit, burial depth of conduit, and crest distance of footing were utilized as the influence parameters for estimating and forecasting the settlement. The predictive strength and accuracy of all models mentioned supra were evaluated using several well-established statistical indices such as Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), root mean square error (RMSE), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), scatter index (SI), and relative percentage difference (RPD).The results showed that among all the models employed in this study, the multi-layer perceptron model has shown better results with r, RMSE, NSE, SI, and RPD values of (0.977, 0.298, 0.937, 0.31, and 4.31) and (0.974, 0.323, 0.928, 0.44 and 3.75) for training and testing dataset, respectively. The sensitivity analysis revealed that all the selected parameters play an important role in determining the output value. However, the applied load, constrained modulus, unit weight, slope angle ratio, hoop stiffness have the highest strength with the relative importance of 18.4%, 16.3% and 15.3%, 13.8%, 11.4%, respectively. Finally, the model was translated into a functional relationship for easy implementation and can prove useful for practitioners and researchers in predicting the settlement of a footing located over a buried conduit in a sloping terrain.

Predicting the Lateral Load Carrying Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Rectangular Columns: Gene Expression Programming

“…Moreover, as it was not feasible to consider every involved parameter in the model development, the applicability of the proposed models in special cases is questionable. Considering all the pros and cons of the proposed capacity prediction models, future researchers are recommended to work on the best AI algorithm, either individual or ensembled [ 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 ], that considers all the possible aspects and explains the mechanism involved.…”

Investigating the Bond Strength of FRP Rebars in Concrete under High Temperature Using Gene-Expression Programming Model

“…Four statistical indices, namely root-mean-square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R 2 ), and Pearson’s coefficient ® , were utilised to appraise the accuracy of the developed GEP model. All these parameters are well-recognised indicators for evaluating the strength of data-driven models [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ].…”

A Novel Method for Optimizing Parameters influencing the Bearing Capacity of Geosynthetic Reinforced Sand Using RSM, ANN, and Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm

“…A hybrid intelligent model has been used for the prediction of load-settlement behavior with large-scale geosynthetic-reinforced soil abutments [47]. In addition, Khanet al [48] investigated the viability, development, implementation, and comparison of five artificial intelligence-based learning machine models to estimate the settlement of footing located over a buried conduit within a soil slope. Furthermore, Bardhanet al [49] presented a comparative analysis of hybrid learning machine models by using 10 swarm intelligence algorithms to estimate the soil compression index of clay based on actual laboratory test data.…”