2018
DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20186300006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load test of new European record holder in span length among extradosed type bridges

Abstract: The article presents acceptance load tests of a newly built extradosed MS-3 bridge located along the national road DK-16 near Ostróda (Poland). The structure features significant dimension in European reference scale. It is a new record holder in span length regarding this distinct bridge category. Its length ranges 206 m. Static and dynamic load tests were performed here. The program was extended by entire structural laser scanning and identification of natural vibration forms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our experience in laser scanning measurements post-processing and aggregation of the results is available also in the following publications [49][50][51][52]. Our recent use of laser scanning during the final acceptance test is described in [53]. The measurements were done for the new European record holder in span length among extradosed type bridges.…”
Section: High Quality Laser Scanning-methodology and Short-term Statimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experience in laser scanning measurements post-processing and aggregation of the results is available also in the following publications [49][50][51][52]. Our recent use of laser scanning during the final acceptance test is described in [53]. The measurements were done for the new European record holder in span length among extradosed type bridges.…”
Section: High Quality Laser Scanning-methodology and Short-term Statimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is needed to load the bridge in such a way that the resulting effects, such as internal forces, displacements, and stresses are large enough. Namely the ratio between the measured and designed values should be greater than 75% and not exceed 100% [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Short-term Load Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a significant methodological change. An earlier study [ 34 ] employed a construction similar to the numerical analysis but whose results were inaccurate compared to the total station. This solution emerged as a result of differences in the interpretation of norms relating to now-outdated approaches to presenting displacement results [ 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%