1971
DOI: 10.1016/0007-3628(71)90009-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loadbearing capacity and deformability of vertical joints in structural walls of large panel buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a plane joint specimen, two stages of joint behavior were revealed, precracking and postcracking. Parameters such as, amount and spacing of transverse joint reinforcement, strength of joint concrete, and width of joint affect the shear strength of a joint . For a joint with castellation, the number and geometry of the shear keys affect the shear strength .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a plane joint specimen, two stages of joint behavior were revealed, precracking and postcracking. Parameters such as, amount and spacing of transverse joint reinforcement, strength of joint concrete, and width of joint affect the shear strength of a joint . For a joint with castellation, the number and geometry of the shear keys affect the shear strength .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expressions proposed by Cholewicki, Chakrabarti et al, Abdul‐Wahab and Sarsam, and Chatveera and Nimityongskul were considered to compare the values of ultimate capacity. The residual strength was compared with ACI‐318 and BS8110.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hansen et al summarized the early work on this topic in a report, which constitutes the work of the CIB commission W23A. The experimental programs that served as basis for the commission's report include the work of Halasz and Tantow, Cholewicki, Pommeret, and Fauchart and Cortini, who used similar test setups as the one used in the present study. Shear tests with other test setups to investigate factors that influence the load‐carrying capacity have also been published .…”
Section: Previous Investigations On Shear Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus has mainly been on the load carrying capacity and the design aspects of the joint configuration. The report by Hansen et al (1976) summarizes the work of the CIB commission W23A and the experimental programs that served as basis for the commissions work, including the work of Cholewicki (1971), Pommeret (1972), and Fauchart and Cortini (1972) who used similar test setups as presented in this work. Later on Nimityongskul and Liu (1980), Chakrabarti et al (1981), Abdul-Wahab (1986), and Serrette et al (1989) performed tests with different test setups also investigating factors influencing the load carrying capacity.…”
Section: Previous Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%