2000
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Active Sound Control Using 2-Norm and ∞-Norm Pressure Minimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in a modally dense acoustic environment, global control quickly becomes impractical as the number of required secondary sources increases approximately in proportion to the cube of the excitation frequency [5]. As a result of this physical limitation, active control in large enclosures is often limited to controlling the sound field in a specific local region and a significant amount of research has been conducted in this area [2,20,21,22,23]. For a local active control system employing a single error sensor and remote secondary source and operating in a diffuse sound field, it has been shown that the diameter of the zone of quiet within which 10 dB of attenuation is achieved is limited to about one tenth of the acoustic wavelength [22].…”
Section: Feedforward Active Noise Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in a modally dense acoustic environment, global control quickly becomes impractical as the number of required secondary sources increases approximately in proportion to the cube of the excitation frequency [5]. As a result of this physical limitation, active control in large enclosures is often limited to controlling the sound field in a specific local region and a significant amount of research has been conducted in this area [2,20,21,22,23]. For a local active control system employing a single error sensor and remote secondary source and operating in a diffuse sound field, it has been shown that the diameter of the zone of quiet within which 10 dB of attenuation is achieved is limited to about one tenth of the acoustic wavelength [22].…”
Section: Feedforward Active Noise Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common problem is a rapid drop of performance with increasing distance from the control points 25,26 . This can be alleviated by controlling both pressure and pressure gradient 27,28 , adding sensors 25,29 , preconditioning room responses (smoothing) 30 , or geometrical optimization to improve the match between the direct and reflected wavefronts at the control points 31 . The last method offers the most practical benefits, as it may improve attenuation away from the control locations without additional equipment or signal processing.…”
Section: A Identification Of a Suitable Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work two and three monopoles are used as the secondary fields and a microphone is placed at the (0.1 m, 0) point, i.e., 10cm from the origin. The reason for choosing this configuration is because the previous study on pure tone and broad-band diffuse fields used the same configuration [Ross, 1980;Joseph, 1990;Tseng, 1999Tseng, , 2000Tseng, , 2009Rafaely, 2000Rafaely, , 2001Chun et al, 2003]. A series of examples are performed to analyze the quiet zones in pure tone and broadband diffuse fields.…”
Section: Quiet Zone Analysis In Pure Tone and Broad-band Diffuse Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although cancelling the noise at many points could produce larger zones of quiet, the optimal spacing between cancellation points varies with frequency [Miyoshi et al, 1994;Guo et al, 1997]. Previous work on active control of diffuse fields investigated the performance of pressure attenuation for single-tone diffuse field only which was produced by single frequency [Ross, 1980;Joseph, 1990;Tseng, 1999Tseng, , 2000. Recent work on broad-band diffuse fields only concentrated on analysis of auto-correlation and cross-correlation of sound pressure [Rafaely, 2000[Rafaely, , 2001Chun et al, 2003].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation