2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local and Interregional Neurochemical Associations Measured by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for Studying Brain Functions and Psychiatric Disorders

Abstract: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) studies have found significant correlations among neurometabolites (e.g., between glutamate and GABA) across individual subjects and altered correlations in neuropsychiatric disorders. In this article, we discuss neurochemical associations among several major neurometabolites which underpin these observations by MRS. We also illustrate the role of spectral editing in eliminating unwanted correlations caused by spectral overlapping. Finally, we describe the prospects of map… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
(203 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study indicate that metabolite concentrations measured by short‐TE MRS are in general correlated in a significant and complex way. These results underscore the importance of continuing to develop spectral editing and/or high magnetic field MRS techniques 24–30 in order to spectrally isolate signals of interest such that the signals of interest are free from the undesirable correlations with other metabolites, MM, and the background baseline. Although spectral editing of certain metabolites is difficult or impossible, de facto statistical independence in the presence of severe spectral overlap may also be achievable by altering the spectral pattern for the purpose of minimizing the undesirable correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The results of this study indicate that metabolite concentrations measured by short‐TE MRS are in general correlated in a significant and complex way. These results underscore the importance of continuing to develop spectral editing and/or high magnetic field MRS techniques 24–30 in order to spectrally isolate signals of interest such that the signals of interest are free from the undesirable correlations with other metabolites, MM, and the background baseline. Although spectral editing of certain metabolites is difficult or impossible, de facto statistical independence in the presence of severe spectral overlap may also be achievable by altering the spectral pattern for the purpose of minimizing the undesirable correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although 7 T magnets have become more widely available for research, the majority of MRI systems use 3 T for neuroimaging applications at present. At 1.5 T magnetic field strength, the ability to distinguish metabolites is particularly challenging due to the poorer separation of resonances in the spectra than at 3 or 7 T. This condensed spectrum can lead to overlaps in peaks, which can result in miscalculation of metabolite concentration (60). Most notably, the standard LCModel method of analysis (see section A Model for Changes in MRS Measured Glutamate, GABA, and Glutamine Levels During the Progression of ALS) depends on both separation of metabolites with resonances that overlap as separation of metabolites from broad baseline resonances of macromolecules.…”
Section: Pulse Sequence and Magnetic Field Strength Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the clinical 31 P MRS literature, concentrations of 31 P-contaning metabolites measured by 31 P MRS have been treated as statistically independent variables in their correlations with clinical metrics. However, spectral overlap can present as an intervening variable that may unfortunately reduce the likelihood of the intended statistical precision and extrapolation of the clinical findings under investigation, unless correlations of metabolites can be parsed correctly [ 13 , 14 ]. When two peaks of the same polarity overlap each other, overdetermination (underdetermination) of one peak is correlated with the underdetermination (overdetermination) of the other, leading to a negative correlation between the two signals [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%