2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11036-018-0994-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Core Members Aided Community Structure Detection

Abstract: The relationship of friends in social networks can be strong or weak. Some research works have shown that a close relationship between friends conducts good community structure. Based on this result, we propose an effective method in detecting community structure in social networks based on the closeness of relations among neighbors. This method calculates the gravity between each neighbor node to core nodes, then makes judgement if the node should be classified in the community or not, and finally form the pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Equation 1, the modularity is represented by Q and it is indicative of the ratio of internal links in a given community to the total number of links less than the expected value of the same ratio for the case where the links are distributed randomly across the network (Fan et al, 2018). Thus, the value of Q must lie within the range between -1 and +1.…”
Section: Modularity (Q)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Equation 1, the modularity is represented by Q and it is indicative of the ratio of internal links in a given community to the total number of links less than the expected value of the same ratio for the case where the links are distributed randomly across the network (Fan et al, 2018). Thus, the value of Q must lie within the range between -1 and +1.…”
Section: Modularity (Q)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, their approaches focus on recommending reviewers for new PRs, but the recommended reviewers include all developers, not only the core developers. In open-source ecosystem like GitHub (Liao et al 2018(Liao et al , 2019a, if the recommended reviewer is not a core developer, the reviewer cannot merge or refuse the PR when he or she thinks the PR meets or does not meet the demand of the project directly. The PR still needs waiting core developer to do the merging or refusing operation.…”
Section: Reviewer Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GitHub, a popular open-source community (Begel et al 2013;Liao et al 2018), has attracted the participations of tens of millions of developers and millions of open-source projects. Pull Request (PR) is a major contributor to external developers of open-source projects (Gousios et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations