2014
DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2014.2334053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Density Encoding for Robust Stereo Matching

Abstract: Stereo correspondence is challenging under realistic conditions due to uncontrolled factors that affect input images, including illumination inconsistencies and radiometric variations. Many local and global models have been suggested to address these problems; however, their performance is often degraded due to the assumption of color consistency between the left and right images. Therefore, we present a new local pattern, local density encoding, for stereo matching measurements to improve the performance of e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two methods tend to overuse piece-wise constant assumption, leading to producing poor results. LDESGM [41] proposes a new local binary encoding pattern based on the intensity relationship between pixels in horizontal, vertical and diagonal directions, and combines this metric with magnitude information to solidify matching cost, then adopts SGM in eight directions to aggregate cost. Our method outperforms LDESGM with a great margin on both metrics, and the average error rates in non-occluded and all regions are reduced by 1.05% and 1.52% respectively.…”
Section: Kitti Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two methods tend to overuse piece-wise constant assumption, leading to producing poor results. LDESGM [41] proposes a new local binary encoding pattern based on the intensity relationship between pixels in horizontal, vertical and diagonal directions, and combines this metric with magnitude information to solidify matching cost, then adopts SGM in eight directions to aggregate cost. Our method outperforms LDESGM with a great margin on both metrics, and the average error rates in non-occluded and all regions are reduced by 1.05% and 1.52% respectively.…”
Section: Kitti Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%