1996
DOI: 10.1093/ee/25.6.1304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Dispersal of Overwintered Colorado Potato Beetle (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) Determined by Mark and Recapture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6). Of course, the relationship in 1999 is based on a much smaller number of individuals than experienced in 2000, which is consistent with the effects of increasing distance between overwintering site and potato Þeld (Weisz et al 1996b, Follett et al 1996. Increasing distance delays the onset of immigration and attenuates the period of immigration ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…6). Of course, the relationship in 1999 is based on a much smaller number of individuals than experienced in 2000, which is consistent with the effects of increasing distance between overwintering site and potato Þeld (Weisz et al 1996b, Follett et al 1996. Increasing distance delays the onset of immigration and attenuates the period of immigration ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Future studies should assess the optimal spatial structure for other crop/pest systems. We predict that transgenic fields should be (1) aggregated to a greater extent to combat insects with large dispersal distances, such as the European corn borer ( Ostrinia nubilalis ) (Bourguet et al ., 2000a), an important pest of corn and (2) less clumped for insects with restricted movement, such as the Colorado potato beetle ( L. decemlineata ) (Follet et al ., 1996; Alyokhin & Ferro, 1999b), a key pest of potatoes.…”
Section: Robustness and Generalization To Other Pestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the harmonic technique, whether it is as a direction-finder (e.g., Mascanzoni & Wallin, 1986) or as direction and range finders (e.g., Riley et al, 1996), will not provide access to all the types of flight that are part of the life system of the CPB. Mark and release techniques can measure average distances travelled (e.g., Follett et al, 1996) but provide no information on travel time, number of interrupted flights, height of flight, and the general effect of landscape on flight behaviour (Osborne et al, 1999;Capaldi et al, 2000). Mark and release techniques can measure average distances travelled (e.g., Follett et al, 1996) but provide no information on travel time, number of interrupted flights, height of flight, and the general effect of landscape on flight behaviour (Osborne et al, 1999;Capaldi et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%