2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local flame attachment and heat fluxes in wind-driven line fires

Abstract: A detailed experimental investigation of turbulent diffusion flames under forced flow was conducted to study local heat fluxes to a nearly adiabatic surface downstream of a gaseous line burner. A variety of ambient wind velocities and fuel flow rates were employed to study different fire scenarios modeling the dynamics of wind-driven fire spread as found in wildland, mine or tunnel fires. The downstream heat flux distribution was correlated as a piecewise function with the Richardson number in two regimes, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an important issue affecting the uncertainty in the determination of the flame extension geometry. Since there are also inherent oscillations for the visible extended flame front beneath the panel, the image average method introduced in Section 2 was adopted to get the mean flame extension geometry as was done in literature . Figure exemplifies the typical flame extension probability contour diagrams with trueQ̇ = 13 kW and h = 10 cm for different panel tilt angles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is an important issue affecting the uncertainty in the determination of the flame extension geometry. Since there are also inherent oscillations for the visible extended flame front beneath the panel, the image average method introduced in Section 2 was adopted to get the mean flame extension geometry as was done in literature . Figure exemplifies the typical flame extension probability contour diagrams with trueQ̇ = 13 kW and h = 10 cm for different panel tilt angles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there are also inherent oscillations for the visible extended flame front beneath the panel, the image average method introduced in Section 2 was adopted to get the mean flame extension geometry as was done in literature. [29][30][31][32] Figure 4 exemplifies According to Zhang et al, 37 the flame extension length is related to the HRR of the confined flame:…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For an inclined surface, the gravitational acceleration in calculating the Grashof number must be replaced by its streamwise component gcossans-serifθ [3,33,34,35,36,37]. As a result, the modified Grashof number Gr is given by Gr=gcossans-serifθ×sans-serifψfalse(TfTpfalse)L3v2 where ψ is the volume thermal expansion coefficient; L is characteristic length along fire plume, which can be estimated as the fire length of unit width, 1/sinfalse(α/2false) in this study; and v is kinematic viscosity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In wind-driven fires, the pulsation of the flame is not expected to scale with burner size in the same way as fires under stagnant conditions as wind plays a significant role in the fire behavior, too. These fires have already been shown to be strongly influenced by a competition between upward buoyant forces from the flame and forward momentum from the wind (Tang et al, 2017a), suggesting a combination of these forces will also play a role in generating intermittent motions within the flame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In our previous work (Tang et al, 2017a), the local total heat flux distribution on the downstream surface of winddriven line fires was investigated and a local Richardson number [Ri x = Gr x / Re 2 x , describing flame buoyancy over wind momentum (Subbarao and Cantwell, 1992;Johnson and Kostiuk, 2000)] was employed to scale measured non-dimensional heat fluxes. Inertial forces would be expected to dominate the flame behavior when Ri x <0.1, and buoyant forces when Ri x > 10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%